Chapter 2381: 2381
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
Latest URL: "Bang!"
The entrance to the projection hall of Lumiere Hall was pushed open, and a middle-aged reporter with a messy beard appeared in front of the crowd angrily.
"Damn! Self-righteous stupid! I am just showing off my cleverness! I don't understand! It's just a pile of stinky horse dung! It should be thrown directly into the trash can! Where are all those clever and wise things going? Go? There is only a meaningless empty shelf! I bet he must think he is very powerful, playing with the audience! If this goes on, sooner or later, he will be finished!"
Talking and cursing, the middle-aged man swept past like a tornado, and the self-talking in his mouth never stopped. His hideous face was showing strong negative emotions, which made people believe that if Someone prevents the interception on his path, he may roll up his sleeves at any time and swing his fist to the opponent's jaw without hesitating for a second.
So, what happened?
The spectators and reporters gathered at the entrance of Lumiere Hall cast doubtful glances. No one dared to ask the other party what was going on. Then they let a trail and watched the reporter walk away. , His mouth was still muttering, "I can't believe I wasted a whole morning just for such a mess of things! I would have gone to a focus unit to explore the secret treasure!"
What a mess?
waste time?
Just a few words made the onlookers even more puzzled by the melon-eating crowd: Is it possible that the "lobster" collapsed?
Although the capacity of the Lumiere Hall is limited and there are still many spectators who have not been able to enter the venue at the first time, there are still a large number of curious spectators and reporters gathered outside the venue, eagerly looking forward to receiving feedback on the scene as soon as possible , The lively scene of the inner three floors and the outer three floors, even in Cannes, is absolutely rare to see-looking at the world, only Lan Li can have such a strong call.
However, the direction of the matter is a bit confusing.
Indeed, everyone is complaining now. It seems that every release of Lan Li’s works is a "fancy praise conference". Film critics and reporters have racked their brains to praise Lan Li. The vocabulary of "the best of career" has developed. To the point of nausea, this situation is really annoying.
But from another perspective, even if Lanly really encounters "Waterloo", audiences now do not believe that the quality of Lanly's works will be so bad. The brand effect of "Lenly-Hall" has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, even back then. His "detachment" is now regaining warmth among senior movie fans.
Suddenly, I saw the reporter leave the scene ahead of schedule, and he was still swearing. The psychological gap made the people who eat melons feel uncomfortable. They were supposed to be happy that "things are not the standard ending." However, the actual situation is confused and not at all. Understand what happened, so that I can't be happy.
Could it be... the expectations are too high? So much so that it created a huge psychological gap, which led to a bad review?
But no one can answer, because the people waiting at the door are poor children who have not been able to watch the premiere. Now they can only look at me and I see you, but they don’t know Lumiere Hall. What happened here, the feeling of anxiety even surpassed the excitement and excitement of "Len Li May Waterloo".
Then...waiting and waiting, there was intermittent applause in Lumiere Hall, but it was neither enthusiastic nor turbulent. It seemed to be just a polite response; but slowly, the applause became louder and thicker. Even standing on the sidelines can clearly capture that enthusiasm, and it continues to rise.
The question mark not only has not been answered, but more and more, there are more and more speculations between the exchange of sights, and the expectation value has become faintly disturbed-this kind of scene is somewhat similar to the premiere of "Interstellar Transition" Similar, but compared to Interstellar, the feedback from "Lobster" is clearly clearer.
At least, it ended in the thunderous applause of the audience. But considering the initial stage of slamming the door and the long silence, things became confusing.
Even after the end of the game, the question still has not been answered, and the first comments posted on Twitter can be a peek at the tip of the iceberg.
"A masterpiece! Ougs-Lensimos once again showed amazing talent! Renly Hall's extraordinary comedy performance is even more impressive!"
"It's a bit regretful. It stopped at a concept, but failed to deepen it further. Ougs-Lancemos could not really see the essence. Obviously there is more room for improvement and exploration in the film. The opening scene is full of fun and finally settled on The confusion of the ending has not been able to achieve the effect."
"By insinuating social class with interpersonal relationships, Lansmos's attempt went further and once again brought an amazing wave of reflection.
"The dramatic implantation is still a bit clumsy, and the setting of the starting, inheriting and turning is still not smooth enough. It can be clearly noticed that Lansmos can do better with the alienation between the characters and the plot, and the overall effect is slightly inferior to the'dog teeth'; But choosing Renly Hall and Rachel Weisz is a magical touch."
"Cameras, colors, transitions, and atmosphere, Ougs-Lance Moss has initially demonstrated his master's aura, a chilling but hilarious black comedy that is definitely on the big screen this year. The most unique movie-watching experience."
"The concept is outstanding, and the execution can be better."
"Best of the year! From the script to the performance to the mirroring, and finally the soundtrack and editing, it's perfect! It's natural!"
"I don't like it. It should be said that I can't like it-obviously a subject that can be more in-depth, but in the end it settles in marriage and love."
"Isn't it Renly Hall's best?"
debate.
debate.
Still arguing.
Different from the controversy caused by works such as "Delta", "Interstellar Crossing", and "Blasting Drummer", it can be clearly noticed that the comments of "Lobster" are more of a mixed, complex emotion between dislike and like. The feeling of neutrality between praise and criticism is somewhat modest overall.
How should it be described?
In other words, emotions are not particularly extreme, not the difference between zero and one hundred points, but the difference between sixty points and eighty points. This ambiguous viewing experience is actually a kind of harm to the movie, because it is It also means that the mood of watching movies is not strong enough, and it will eventually become mediocre.
However, the problem is that the "lobster" is far from mediocrity. You can capture more things between those words, but what it is, you can only wait for the audience to watch it and dig it out.
However, Twitter is only Twitter after all, and those comments can only be used as a reference.
Every year, at major film festivals, the voices of "Masters" on Twitter are endless. Just the main competition unit may be able to see more than one "Masters", and then create a kind of all the masters. The competition works are all the illusion of the best candidates of the year, so that the audience who missed the scene couldn't help but follow the passion.
But what about the actual situation?
It will be known only after the movie is actually released.
Immediately afterwards, the door of the projection hall of Lumiere Hall opened, and the audience attending the premiere finally appeared, venting down like a torrent.
"I think it's not just about love..."
"It's still about marriage."
"No, no, I mean, not only that, but also about the entire social order. Do you understand? I think myopic women represent the cunning ruling class..."
"You have over-interpreted, where is it so deep?"
Men in twos and threes are rushing to exchange opinions, but no one can convince anyone. Everyone has their own opinions; not far away, hordes of ladies are also expressing their opinions. However, the perspective has given the film a different perspective.
"I think he will blind himself. This is about the confrontation between love and the system. David represents love..."
"I have different opinions. I think this is a discussion about the laws of survival. David and myopic women represent two different ways of living..."
"What is this? It's too far off track, right? There is no such content at all. Love and marriage are the most obvious superficial topics, and I think the most important part now lies in the assumption that David stabbed his eyes, and There are no short-sighted women, so what does this mean?"
"Your interpretation is too deep, but I think Oggs has not reached such a height. This is where I am disappointed with the movie. It can be better."
The discussions on twitter held different perspectives, but the group of people standing at the door of Lumiere Hall showed another perspective.
"Cameras, editing, soundtracks, these are really good. Ougs has made very obvious progress and has initially reached the master level. I like the whole tone very much."
"What I like most is the performance and lines~www.novelhall.com~ In order to fit the cool tone of Oggs, the actors try to converge in their performances as much as possible. Only two outburst scenes are all left to Lan Li to handle..."
"Yes, yes, yes, one is the forest dance scene alone, and the other is the ending scene of the four-eye switching scene. In these two scenes, Lan Li is very clever. Personally, I like this kind of Lan Li even more. Compared to the'burst drummer'."
"That's right, that's too Oscar. I think the scene of the forest solo dance can be interpreted in depth. That scene completely broke the overall balance. Ougs's concepts and ideas may be hidden in it. But the filming process was too devoted. , I only perceive the shock, but I can't savor it carefully."
"Well, I also think the second time I watched it. Even the third time. I have to admit one thing, the lines are in my heart, have you noticed many details? Regarding David's ex-wife and brother, there are many details in the lines. You can dig it out. I think the movie is more than what it is now."
Argument, this is the absolute theme, not purely like or hate. It seems that everyone can find what they like or dislike. This intricate look and feel has also become the main theme after the film is over. Within a short time, It is difficult to draw a conclusion that discussion is the real main trend.
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
Latest URL: "Bang!"
The entrance to the projection hall of Lumiere Hall was pushed open, and a middle-aged reporter with a messy beard appeared in front of the crowd angrily.
"Damn! Self-righteous stupid! I am just showing off my cleverness! I don't understand! It's just a pile of stinky horse dung! It should be thrown directly into the trash can! Where are all those clever and wise things going? Go? There is only a meaningless empty shelf! I bet he must think he is very powerful, playing with the audience! If this goes on, sooner or later, he will be finished!"
Talking and cursing, the middle-aged man swept past like a tornado, and the self-talking in his mouth never stopped. His hideous face was showing strong negative emotions, which made people believe that if Someone prevents the interception on his path, he may roll up his sleeves at any time and swing his fist to the opponent's jaw without hesitating for a second.
So, what happened?
The spectators and reporters gathered at the entrance of Lumiere Hall cast doubtful glances. No one dared to ask the other party what was going on. Then they let a trail and watched the reporter walk away. , His mouth was still muttering, "I can't believe I wasted a whole morning just for such a mess of things! I would have gone to a focus unit to explore the secret treasure!"
What a mess?
waste time?
Just a few words made the onlookers even more puzzled by the melon-eating crowd: Is it possible that the "lobster" collapsed?
Although the capacity of the Lumiere Hall is limited and there are still many spectators who have not been able to enter the venue at the first time, there are still a large number of curious spectators and reporters gathered outside the venue, eagerly looking forward to receiving feedback on the scene as soon as possible , The lively scene of the inner three floors and the outer three floors, even in Cannes, is absolutely rare to see-looking at the world, only Lan Li can have such a strong call.
However, the direction of the matter is a bit confusing.
Indeed, everyone is complaining now. It seems that every release of Lan Li’s works is a "fancy praise conference". Film critics and reporters have racked their brains to praise Lan Li. The vocabulary of "the best of career" has developed. To the point of nausea, this situation is really annoying.
But from another perspective, even if Lanly really encounters "Waterloo", audiences now do not believe that the quality of Lanly's works will be so bad. The brand effect of "Lenly-Hall" has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, even back then. His "detachment" is now regaining warmth among senior movie fans.
Suddenly, I saw the reporter leave the scene ahead of schedule, and he was still swearing. The psychological gap made the people who eat melons feel uncomfortable. They were supposed to be happy that "things are not the standard ending." However, the actual situation is confused and not at all. Understand what happened, so that I can't be happy.
Could it be... the expectations are too high? So much so that it created a huge psychological gap, which led to a bad review?
But no one can answer, because the people waiting at the door are poor children who have not been able to watch the premiere. Now they can only look at me and I see you, but they don’t know Lumiere Hall. What happened here, the feeling of anxiety even surpassed the excitement and excitement of "Len Li May Waterloo".
Then...waiting and waiting, there was intermittent applause in Lumiere Hall, but it was neither enthusiastic nor turbulent. It seemed to be just a polite response; but slowly, the applause became louder and thicker. Even standing on the sidelines can clearly capture that enthusiasm, and it continues to rise.
The question mark not only has not been answered, but more and more, there are more and more speculations between the exchange of sights, and the expectation value has become faintly disturbed-this kind of scene is somewhat similar to the premiere of "Interstellar Transition" Similar, but compared to Interstellar, the feedback from "Lobster" is clearly clearer.
At least, it ended in the thunderous applause of the audience. But considering the initial stage of slamming the door and the long silence, things became confusing.
Even after the end of the game, the question still has not been answered, and the first comments posted on Twitter can be a peek at the tip of the iceberg.
"A masterpiece! Ougs-Lensimos once again showed amazing talent! Renly Hall's extraordinary comedy performance is even more impressive!"
"It's a bit regretful. It stopped at a concept, but failed to deepen it further. Ougs-Lancemos could not really see the essence. Obviously there is more room for improvement and exploration in the film. The opening scene is full of fun and finally settled on The confusion of the ending has not been able to achieve the effect."
"By insinuating social class with interpersonal relationships, Lansmos's attempt went further and once again brought an amazing wave of reflection.
"The dramatic implantation is still a bit clumsy, and the setting of the starting, inheriting and turning is still not smooth enough. It can be clearly noticed that Lansmos can do better with the alienation between the characters and the plot, and the overall effect is slightly inferior to the'dog teeth'; But choosing Renly Hall and Rachel Weisz is a magical touch."
"Cameras, colors, transitions, and atmosphere, Ougs-Lance Moss has initially demonstrated his master's aura, a chilling but hilarious black comedy that is definitely on the big screen this year. The most unique movie-watching experience."
"The concept is outstanding, and the execution can be better."
"Best of the year! From the script to the performance to the mirroring, and finally the soundtrack and editing, it's perfect! It's natural!"
"I don't like it. It should be said that I can't like it-obviously a subject that can be more in-depth, but in the end it settles in marriage and love."
"Isn't it Renly Hall's best?"
debate.
debate.
Still arguing.
Different from the controversy caused by works such as "Delta", "Interstellar Crossing", and "Blasting Drummer", it can be clearly noticed that the comments of "Lobster" are more of a mixed, complex emotion between dislike and like. The feeling of neutrality between praise and criticism is somewhat modest overall.
How should it be described?
In other words, emotions are not particularly extreme, not the difference between zero and one hundred points, but the difference between sixty points and eighty points. This ambiguous viewing experience is actually a kind of harm to the movie, because it is It also means that the mood of watching movies is not strong enough, and it will eventually become mediocre.
However, the problem is that the "lobster" is far from mediocrity. You can capture more things between those words, but what it is, you can only wait for the audience to watch it and dig it out.
However, Twitter is only Twitter after all, and those comments can only be used as a reference.
Every year, at major film festivals, the voices of "Masters" on Twitter are endless. Just the main competition unit may be able to see more than one "Masters", and then create a kind of all the masters. The competition works are all the illusion of the best candidates of the year, so that the audience who missed the scene couldn't help but follow the passion.
But what about the actual situation?
It will be known only after the movie is actually released.
Immediately afterwards, the door of the projection hall of Lumiere Hall opened, and the audience attending the premiere finally appeared, venting down like a torrent.
"I think it's not just about love..."
"It's still about marriage."
"No, no, I mean, not only that, but also about the entire social order. Do you understand? I think myopic women represent the cunning ruling class..."
"You have over-interpreted, where is it so deep?"
Men in twos and threes are rushing to exchange opinions, but no one can convince anyone. Everyone has their own opinions; not far away, hordes of ladies are also expressing their opinions. However, the perspective has given the film a different perspective.
"I think he will blind himself. This is about the confrontation between love and the system. David represents love..."
"I have different opinions. I think this is a discussion about the laws of survival. David and myopic women represent two different ways of living..."
"What is this? It's too far off track, right? There is no such content at all. Love and marriage are the most obvious superficial topics, and I think the most important part now lies in the assumption that David stabbed his eyes, and There are no short-sighted women, so what does this mean?"
"Your interpretation is too deep, but I think Oggs has not reached such a height. This is where I am disappointed with the movie. It can be better."
The discussions on twitter held different perspectives, but the group of people standing at the door of Lumiere Hall showed another perspective.
"Cameras, editing, soundtracks, these are really good. Ougs has made very obvious progress and has initially reached the master level. I like the whole tone very much."
"What I like most is the performance and lines~www.novelhall.com~ In order to fit the cool tone of Oggs, the actors try to converge in their performances as much as possible. Only two outburst scenes are all left to Lan Li to handle..."
"Yes, yes, yes, one is the forest dance scene alone, and the other is the ending scene of the four-eye switching scene. In these two scenes, Lan Li is very clever. Personally, I like this kind of Lan Li even more. Compared to the'burst drummer'."
"That's right, that's too Oscar. I think the scene of the forest solo dance can be interpreted in depth. That scene completely broke the overall balance. Ougs's concepts and ideas may be hidden in it. But the filming process was too devoted. , I only perceive the shock, but I can't savor it carefully."
"Well, I also think the second time I watched it. Even the third time. I have to admit one thing, the lines are in my heart, have you noticed many details? Regarding David's ex-wife and brother, there are many details in the lines. You can dig it out. I think the movie is more than what it is now."
Argument, this is the absolute theme, not purely like or hate. It seems that everyone can find what they like or dislike. This intricate look and feel has also become the main theme after the film is over. Within a short time, It is difficult to draw a conclusion that discussion is the real main trend.
Latest URL: "Bang!"The entrance to the projection hall of Lumiere Hall was pushed open, and a middle-aged reporter with a messy beard appeared in front of the crowd angrily."Damn! Self-righteous stupid! I am just showing off my cleverness! I don't understand! It's just a pile of stinky horse dung! It should be thrown directly into the trash can! Where are all those clever and wise things going? Go? There is only a meaningless empty shelf! I bet he must think he is very powerful, playing with the audience! If this goes on, sooner or later, he will be finished!"Talking and cursing, the middle-aged man swept past like a tornado, and the self-talking in his mouth never stopped. His hideous face was showing strong negative emotions, which made people believe that if Someone prevents the interception on his path, he may roll up his sleeves at any time and swing his fist to the opponent's jaw without hesitating for a second.So, what happened?The spectators and reporters gathered at the entrance of Lumiere Hall cast doubtful glances. No one dared to ask the other party what was going on. Then they let a trail and watched the reporter walk away. , His mouth was still muttering, "I can't believe I wasted a whole morning just for such a mess of things! I would have gone to a focus unit to explore the secret treasure!"What a mess?waste time?Just a few words made the onlookers even more puzzled by the melon-eating crowd: Is it possible that the "lobster" collapsed?Although the capacity of the Lumiere Hall is limited and there are still many spectators who have not been able to enter the venue at the first time, there are still a large number of curious spectators and reporters gathered outside the venue, eagerly looking forward to receiving feedback on the scene as soon as possible , The lively scene of the inner three floors and the outer three floors, even in Cannes, is absolutely rare to see-looking at the world, only Lan Li can have such a strong call.However, the direction of the matter is a bit confusing.Indeed, everyone is complaining now. It seems that every release of Lan Li's works is a "fancy praise conference". Film critics and reporters have racked their brains to praise Lan Li. The vocabulary of "the best of career" has developed. To the point of nausea, this situation is really annoying.But from another perspective, even if Lanly really encounters "Waterloo", audiences now do not believe that the quality of Lanly's works will be so bad. The brand effect of "Lenly-Hall" has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, even back then. His "detachment" is now regaining warmth among senior movie fans.Suddenly, I saw the reporter leave the scene ahead of schedule, and he was still swearing. The psychological gap made the people who eat melons feel uncomfortable. They were supposed to be happy that "things are not the standard ending." However, the actual situation is confused and not at all. Understand what happened, so that I can't be happy.Could it be... the expectations are too high? So much so that it created a huge psychological gap, which led to a bad review?But no one can answer, because the people waiting at the door are poor children who have not been able to watch the premiere. Now they can only look at me and I see you, but they don't know Lumiere Hall. What happened here, the feeling of anxiety even surpassed the excitement and excitement of "Len Li May Waterloo".Then...waiting and waiting, there was intermittent applause in Lumiere Hall, but it was neither enthusiastic nor turbulent. It seemed to be just a polite response; but slowly, the applause became louder and thicker. Even standing on the sidelines can clearly capture that enthusiasm, and it continues to rise.The question mark not only has not been answered, but more and more, there are more and more speculations between the exchange of sights, and the expectation value has become faintly disturbed-this kind of scene is somewhat similar to the premiere of "Interstellar Transition" Similar, but compared to Interstellar, the feedback from "Lobster" is clearly clearer.At least, it ended in the thunderous applause of the audience. But considering the initial stage of slamming the door and the long silence, things became confusing.Even after the end of the game, the question still has not been answered, and the first comments posted on Twitter can be a peek at the tip of the iceberg."A masterpiece! Ougs-Lensimos once again showed amazing talent! Renly Hall's extraordinary comedy performance is even more impressive!""It's a bit regretful. It stopped at a concept, but failed to deepen it further. Ougs-Lancemos could not really see the essence. Obviously there is more room for improvement and exploration in the film. The opening scene is full of fun and finally settled on The confusion of the ending has not been able to achieve the effect.""By insinuating social class with interpersonal relationships, Lansmos's attempt went further and once again brought an amazing wave of reflection."The dramatic implantation is still a bit clumsy, and the setting of the starting, inheriting and turning is still not smooth enough. It can be clearly noticed that Lansmos can do better with the alienation between the characters and the plot, and the overall effect is slightly inferior to the'dog teeth'; But choosing Renly Hall and Rachel Weisz is a magical touch.""Cameras, colors, transitions, and atmosphere, Ougs-Lance Moss has initially demonstrated his master's aura, a chilling but hilarious black comedy that is definitely on the big screen this year. The most unique movie-watching experience.""The concept is outstanding, and the execution can be better.""Best of the year! From the script to the performance to the mirroring, and finally the soundtrack and editing, it's perfect! It's natural!""I don't like it. It should be said that I can't like it-obviously a subject that can be more in-depth, but in the end it settles in marriage and love.""Isn't it Renly Hall's best?"debate.debate.Still arguing.Different from the controversy caused by works such as "Delta", "Interstellar Crossing", and "Blasting Drummer", it can be clearly noticed that the comments of "Lobster" are more of a mixed, complex emotion between dislike and like. The feeling of neutrality between praise and criticism is somewhat modest overall.How should it be described?In other words, emotions are not particularly extreme, not the difference between zero and one hundred points, but the difference between sixty points and eighty points. This ambiguous viewing experience is actually a kind of harm to the movie, because it is It also means that the mood of watching movies is not strong enough, and it will eventually become mediocre.However, the problem is that the "lobster" is far from mediocrity. You can capture more things between those words, but what it is, you can only wait for the audience to watch it and dig it out.However, Twitter is only Twitter after all, and those comments can only be used as a reference.Every year, at major film festivals, the voices of "Masters" on Twitter are endless. Just the main competition unit may be able to see more than one "Masters", and then create a kind of all the masters. The competition works are all the illusion of the best candidates of the year, so that the audience who missed the scene couldn't help but follow the passion.But what about the actual situation?It will be known only after the movie is actually released.Immediately afterwards, the door of the projection hall of Lumiere Hall opened, and the audience attending the premiere finally appeared, venting down like a torrent."I think it's not just about love...""It's still about marriage.""No, no, I mean, not only that, but also about the entire social order. Do you understand? I think myopic women represent the cunning ruling class...""You have over-interpreted, where is it so deep?"Men in twos and threes are rushing to exchange opinions, but no one can convince anyone. Everyone has their own opinions; not far away, hordes of ladies are also expressing their opinions. However, the perspective has given the film a different perspective."I think he will blind himself. This is about the confrontation between love and the system. David represents love...""I have different opinions. I think this is a discussion about the laws of survival. David and myopic women represent two different ways of living...""What is this? It's too far off track, right? There is no such content at all. Love and marriage are the most obvious superficial topics, and I think the most important part now lies in the assumption that David stabbed his eyes, and There are no short-sighted women, so what does this mean?""Your interpretation is too deep, but I think Oggs has not reached such a height. This is where I am disappointed with the movie. It can be better."The discussions on twitter held different perspectives, but the group of people standing at the door of Lumiere Hall showed another perspective."Cameras, editing, soundtracks, these are really good. Ougs has made very obvious progress and has initially reached the master level. I like the whole tone very much.""What I like most is the performance and lines~www.novelhall.com~ In order to fit the cool tone of Oggs, the actors try to converge in their performances as much as possible. Only two outburst scenes are all left to Lan Li to handle...""Yes, yes, yes, one is the forest dance scene alone, and the other is the ending scene of the four-eye switching scene. In these two scenes, Lan Li is very clever. Personally, I like this kind of Lan Li even more. Compared to the'burst drummer'.""That's right, that's too Oscar. I think the scene of the forest solo dance can be interpreted in depth. That scene completely broke the overall balance. Ougs's concepts and ideas may be hidden in it. But the filming process was too devoted. , I only perceive the shock, but I can't savor it carefully.""Well, I also think the second time I watched it. Even the third time. I have to admit one thing, the lines are in my heart, have you noticed many details? Regarding David's ex-wife and brother, there are many details in the lines. You can dig it out. I think the movie is more than what it is now."Argument, this is the absolute theme, not purely like or hate. It seems that everyone can find what they like or dislike. This intricate look and feel has also become the main theme after the film is over. Within a short time, It is difficult to draw a conclusion that discussion is the real main trend.
