Chapter 1305: Hustle and bustle
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
Who played the murderer? What kind of sparks did the assignment and partnership of Morgan, Brad and Hugo spark out? The most important thing is that it is absolutely rare for Roger to call a "great" work. The last time the "Pulp Fiction" was praised as "great" is still influencing the trend of American culture, so this time What will happen?
All this has become the most exciting topic after the release of "Seven Deadly Sins".
Roger did not directly state the roles played by the three protagonists, but he was full of praise for the performance of the characters, which also stimulated the curiosity of the audience. Especially after the premiere, all the audience who participated in the premiere were silent. They refused to discuss the story and just repeatedly emphasized that "spoilers are not fun. You must enter the cinema to watch it yourself." This was originally true, but behind the audience's endless praise of the movie, it is a bit annoying: you always say that it looks good, but you don't say why it is, it is really curious and anxious!
Obviously, the audience who participated in the premiere are proud of this effect. They enjoy the superiority of knowing the ending, and the irritability of other people, and they look forward to other audiences walking into the cinema to suffer. Glorious when frightened.
Although there are also a small number of people who can't keep talking, spoilers in advance, but in the era when the Internet has not yet become popular, the dissemination of news is obviously in the hands of mainstream media, so the true ending is always a secret for most viewers. Almost all the media cooperated with the propaganda strategy of the "Seven Deadly Sins" crew and avoided talking about the final murderer, which also incited the audience's curiosity to a new high.
What is even more annoying is that the media have all praised the movie!
"U.S. Weekly" scored ninety, and said in the film review, "This is an interesting, shocking, shrewd, dirty, and very disturbing work-you may not like what you see Arrived, but you will definitely be affected by this story!"
The content of this kind of comment is also unpredictable, "You may not like what you see"? But "U.S. Weekly" gave a high score of ninety points. Isn't this a contradiction? However, if you think about the profound social discussions triggered by the Los Angeles Times, it is not surprising: works that touch the sensitive nerves of society are never so easy to be likable, but no one can deny the profoundness and harmony of the film. Wonderful.
"Undoubtedly, this is a very'disgusting' work." The comments of the "Hollywood Reporter" are also very intriguing. Coupled with a high score of 88 points, it becomes more interesting and exciting. To arouse people’s curiosity.
The "New York Times" also joined the ranks, "Undoubtedly, this is a thought-provoking and thrilling work, but it is difficult for you to enjoy too much'pleasure' from the movie." Eighty-five points. The evaluation also gave a positive evaluation to the movie.
It is worth noting that thriller and suspense movies are always difficult to please film critics, just as horror movies are always dubbed "crude" and action movies are always regarded as "empty plot", thriller and suspense movies Subject to its own subject matter, works with an average score of 60 points are no longer seen. For example, "The Silent Lamb" received an average score of 84 points that year. It is still a film history record, so this work is the last Also achieved a grand slam at the Oscars.
Objectively speaking, there is still a gap between the "Seven Deadly Sins" and "The Silent Lambs" from the perspective of film technology, but even so, the "Seven Deadly Sins" still received such high evaluations from film critics, and many authoritative media gave them unanimously. With a score of more than eighty points, this becomes more and more rare.
The "Wall Street Journal" gave an 80-point evaluation, and said in the comments, "The main story line in one go concealed many plot loopholes, but it still created a sensational, thought-provoking case, and the reflection after quiet. Become the greatest success of the film."
In addition, the "San Francisco Chronicle" also scored 80 points, "This horror and suspense work is permeated with a disturbing and sick atmosphere from beginning to end."
It can be seen from the many media reviews of the "Seven Deadly Sins" that the ratings of this thriller and suspense movie are bound to be incomparable with "Schindler's List", "Pulp Fiction", and "Before Sunrise". There was a lot of praise, and this work also ushered in a lot of controversy. It was originally a work with many contradictions. Even the media that praised the film used contradictory words as evaluations. Obviously, this It is a work that requires people to calm down, think slowly, and savor it carefully. This has led to huge differences in the media's views on the work, and the tumultuous discussion has pushed it to the peak of public opinion.
The "San Francisco Chronicle" score is the lowest rating among the first batch of reviews. They believe that "the premise is that the film is indeed intriguing, but the whole work is slimy, wet, pretentious, and not at all shocking." So. The relentless film critics almost call the movie useless, but they still agree with the "intriguing" at the core of the movie's theme, which is indeed very intriguing.
"USA Today" has always had no cold with Hugo, and it is rare to see them express their appreciation for Hugo. This time is no exception. "Director David Fincher tried to create a more gloomy, depressed, and fearful atmosphere. Unearthed the deep psychological emotions of the serial killer beyond the dim and horrible style, but the result was self-defeating, the story was inappropriate, and the theme was vague."
The 63-point evaluation also clearly shows the newspaper's attitude towards the "seven deadly sins".
The "Houston Chronicle" also gave a score of 63. Their evaluation was the first batch of hot film reviews after the film premiere. As the top ten newspapers in national sales, its influence cannot be underestimated. Obviously they are The "seven deadly sins" are not cold either. "This is a lost sight-but a charming and attractive work that loses sight. Such a film full of first-class talents is forced to become an absurd hybrid. I can feel that the director is struggling to make the nonsense credible, but unfortunately, his efforts are still not enough."
Interestingly, "USA Today", "Houston Chronicle" and "New York Post" are all leaders of the Block League, and the "San Francisco Chronicle" also joined the Block League once, but this time after the "Seven Deadly Sins" were released, The "New York Post" shut up unexpectedly. This was really unexpected. As a result, the "Houston Chronicle" replaced it and became the leader in criticizing the "Seven Deadly Sins."
"The director tried to connect the whole story with religious beliefs. The dim and hopeless city streets, rainy weather, the old police officer’s indifference to human feelings, and the tragic fateful ending. All these make people start to look at themselves and this society, mankind. Is it not possible to escape the fate of these seven deadly sins? From this point of view, the film is indeed impressive, but the theme and ideas that the film tries to express are too pale and weak.
The seven deadly sins are actually the most basic human nature. If they are all sins, they are actually denying human nature itself, which is a fallacy of ‘guilty of being born’. The most people in the movie seem to be guilty and deserve to be tried, but these are actually the extreme prejudices of the murderer's own wishful thinking.
Human nature is not sin, but the extreme human nature is the source of sin. Most of our ordinary people are still far from that extreme humanity, and there is no need to rise to the height of judgment on ourselves. Instead, many times we should try to understand this nature.
In the shaping of characters, it is obviously not the director's specialty.
The veteran police officer’s maturity and pessimism did not have enough details to pave the way. Except for an ex-girlfriend who mentioned it once, such a steady and weather-beaten person fell into confusion for such a simple reason, which was obviously too superficial. What's even more ridiculous is that the seemingly in-depth conversation between the old police officer and the young police officer in the bar actually impacted the old police officer's outlook on life, which seemed too simple.
The personality of the young police officer is even more of a failure. In addition to impulse or impulse, such an impulsive character is unconvincing under the weak interpretation of the actor, and the emotional transition is too simple. The love between him and his wife is a few words. It is outlined in between, but it is still not enough to promote the plot.
The murderer is even more so. In the limited time, he didn't even explain the background of the murderer. His seemingly godlike preaching was long and boring. After all, his self-proclaimed status was just a marginal man living in a dilapidated apartment. The plot tried its best to show the murderer's wit and cleverness, but it was obviously destroyed by the terrible ending.
Of course, it is still a work worth discussing purely from the reflections caused by the film; but from the perspective of the degree of completion of the film, it is a failure. "
The "Houston Chronicle" can be said to have severely criticized the movie, but still gave a rating of 63 points, which is in line with many points of view in its film review.
The film review of the "Houston Chronicle" was criticized by the "Chicago Tribune", which many people did not expect, "This is a movie, not a'Reminiscence of a Water Year'."
This is really uncontrollable. The "Chicago Tribune" means that the length of the movie is limited. The director uses enough details to outline the personality of the characters in the limited time. This is already very rare. The "Seven Deadly Sins" are true. The core idea is people's indifference to the reflection of society-and this has also been recognized by the "Houston Chronicle". As for the characters themselves, they completely need to be supported by the performance of the actors. From this point of view, the Chicago Tribune praised the "Seven Deadly Sins" in this way.
Although there have been controversies in film reviews, there are praises and criticisms, which has also opened up the discussion around the "seven deadly sins" in full swing, but in general, many praises have become the main theme. In addition, In these contradictory but excellent evaluations, words of praise for actors can be seen everywhere.
Obviously, no one wants to miss the head-on showdown between Hugo and Brad.
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
Who played the murderer? What kind of sparks did the assignment and partnership of Morgan, Brad and Hugo spark out? The most important thing is that it is absolutely rare for Roger to call a "great" work. The last time the "Pulp Fiction" was praised as "great" is still influencing the trend of American culture, so this time What will happen?
All this has become the most exciting topic after the release of "Seven Deadly Sins".
Roger did not directly state the roles played by the three protagonists, but he was full of praise for the performance of the characters, which also stimulated the curiosity of the audience. Especially after the premiere, all the audience who participated in the premiere were silent. They refused to discuss the story and just repeatedly emphasized that "spoilers are not fun. You must enter the cinema to watch it yourself." This was originally true, but behind the audience's endless praise of the movie, it is a bit annoying: you always say that it looks good, but you don't say why it is, it is really curious and anxious!
Obviously, the audience who participated in the premiere are proud of this effect. They enjoy the superiority of knowing the ending, and the irritability of other people, and they look forward to other audiences walking into the cinema to suffer. Glorious when frightened.
Although there are also a small number of people who can't keep talking, spoilers in advance, but in the era when the Internet has not yet become popular, the dissemination of news is obviously in the hands of mainstream media, so the true ending is always a secret for most viewers. Almost all the media cooperated with the propaganda strategy of the "Seven Deadly Sins" crew and avoided talking about the final murderer, which also incited the audience's curiosity to a new high.
What is even more annoying is that the media have all praised the movie!
"U.S. Weekly" scored ninety, and said in the film review, "This is an interesting, shocking, shrewd, dirty, and very disturbing work-you may not like what you see Arrived, but you will definitely be affected by this story!"
The content of this kind of comment is also unpredictable, "You may not like what you see"? But "U.S. Weekly" gave a high score of ninety points. Isn't this a contradiction? However, if you think about the profound social discussions triggered by the Los Angeles Times, it is not surprising: works that touch the sensitive nerves of society are never so easy to be likable, but no one can deny the profoundness and harmony of the film. Wonderful.
"Undoubtedly, this is a very'disgusting' work." The comments of the "Hollywood Reporter" are also very intriguing. Coupled with a high score of 88 points, it becomes more interesting and exciting. To arouse people’s curiosity.
The "New York Times" also joined the ranks, "Undoubtedly, this is a thought-provoking and thrilling work, but it is difficult for you to enjoy too much'pleasure' from the movie." Eighty-five points. The evaluation also gave a positive evaluation to the movie.
It is worth noting that thriller and suspense movies are always difficult to please film critics, just as horror movies are always dubbed "crude" and action movies are always regarded as "empty plot", thriller and suspense movies Subject to its own subject matter, works with an average score of 60 points are no longer seen. For example, "The Silent Lamb" received an average score of 84 points that year. It is still a film history record, so this work is the last Also achieved a grand slam at the Oscars.
Objectively speaking, there is still a gap between the "Seven Deadly Sins" and "The Silent Lambs" from the perspective of film technology, but even so, the "Seven Deadly Sins" still received such high evaluations from film critics, and many authoritative media gave them unanimously. With a score of more than eighty points, this becomes more and more rare.
The "Wall Street Journal" gave an 80-point evaluation, and said in the comments, "The main story line in one go concealed many plot loopholes, but it still created a sensational, thought-provoking case, and the reflection after quiet. Become the greatest success of the film."
In addition, the "San Francisco Chronicle" also scored 80 points, "This horror and suspense work is permeated with a disturbing and sick atmosphere from beginning to end."
It can be seen from the many media reviews of the "Seven Deadly Sins" that the ratings of this thriller and suspense movie are bound to be incomparable with "Schindler's List", "Pulp Fiction", and "Before Sunrise". There was a lot of praise, and this work also ushered in a lot of controversy. It was originally a work with many contradictions. Even the media that praised the film used contradictory words as evaluations. Obviously, this It is a work that requires people to calm down, think slowly, and savor it carefully. This has led to huge differences in the media's views on the work, and the tumultuous discussion has pushed it to the peak of public opinion.
The "San Francisco Chronicle" score is the lowest rating among the first batch of reviews. They believe that "the premise is that the film is indeed intriguing, but the whole work is slimy, wet, pretentious, and not at all shocking." So. The relentless film critics almost call the movie useless, but they still agree with the "intriguing" at the core of the movie's theme, which is indeed very intriguing.
"USA Today" has always had no cold with Hugo, and it is rare to see them express their appreciation for Hugo. This time is no exception. "Director David Fincher tried to create a more gloomy, depressed, and fearful atmosphere. Unearthed the deep psychological emotions of the serial killer beyond the dim and horrible style, but the result was self-defeating, the story was inappropriate, and the theme was vague."
The 63-point evaluation also clearly shows the newspaper's attitude towards the "seven deadly sins".
The "Houston Chronicle" also gave a score of 63. Their evaluation was the first batch of hot film reviews after the film premiere. As the top ten newspapers in national sales, its influence cannot be underestimated. Obviously they are The "seven deadly sins" are not cold either. "This is a lost sight-but a charming and attractive work that loses sight. Such a film full of first-class talents is forced to become an absurd hybrid. I can feel that the director is struggling to make the nonsense credible, but unfortunately, his efforts are still not enough."
Interestingly, "USA Today", "Houston Chronicle" and "New York Post" are all leaders of the Block League, and the "San Francisco Chronicle" also joined the Block League once, but this time after the "Seven Deadly Sins" were released, The "New York Post" shut up unexpectedly. This was really unexpected. As a result, the "Houston Chronicle" replaced it and became the leader in criticizing the "Seven Deadly Sins."
"The director tried to connect the whole story with religious beliefs. The dim and hopeless city streets, rainy weather, the old police officer’s indifference to human feelings, and the tragic fateful ending. All these make people start to look at themselves and this society, mankind. Is it not possible to escape the fate of these seven deadly sins? From this point of view, the film is indeed impressive, but the theme and ideas that the film tries to express are too pale and weak.
The seven deadly sins are actually the most basic human nature. If they are all sins, they are actually denying human nature itself, which is a fallacy of ‘guilty of being born’. The most people in the movie seem to be guilty and deserve to be tried, but these are actually the extreme prejudices of the murderer's own wishful thinking.
Human nature is not sin, but the extreme human nature is the source of sin. Most of our ordinary people are still far from that extreme humanity, and there is no need to rise to the height of judgment on ourselves. Instead, many times we should try to understand this nature.
In the shaping of characters, it is obviously not the director's specialty.
The veteran police officer’s maturity and pessimism did not have enough details to pave the way. Except for an ex-girlfriend who mentioned it once, such a steady and weather-beaten person fell into confusion for such a simple reason, which was obviously too superficial. What's even more ridiculous is that the seemingly in-depth conversation between the old police officer and the young police officer in the bar actually impacted the old police officer's outlook on life, which seemed too simple.
The personality of the young police officer is even more of a failure. In addition to impulse or impulse, such an impulsive character is unconvincing under the weak interpretation of the actor, and the emotional transition is too simple. The love between him and his wife is a few words. It is outlined in between, but it is still not enough to promote the plot.
The murderer is even more so. In the limited time, he didn't even explain the background of the murderer. His seemingly godlike preaching was long and boring. After all, his self-proclaimed status was just a marginal man living in a dilapidated apartment. The plot tried its best to show the murderer's wit and cleverness, but it was obviously destroyed by the terrible ending.
Of course, it is still a work worth discussing purely from the reflections caused by the film; but from the perspective of the degree of completion of the film, it is a failure. "
The "Houston Chronicle" can be said to have severely criticized the movie, but still gave a rating of 63 points, which is in line with many points of view in its film review.
The film review of the "Houston Chronicle" was criticized by the "Chicago Tribune", which many people did not expect, "This is a movie, not a'Reminiscence of a Water Year'."
This is really uncontrollable. The "Chicago Tribune" means that the length of the movie is limited. The director uses enough details to outline the personality of the characters in the limited time. This is already very rare. The "Seven Deadly Sins" are true. The core idea is people's indifference to the reflection of society-and this has also been recognized by the "Houston Chronicle". As for the characters themselves, they completely need to be supported by the performance of the actors. From this point of view, the Chicago Tribune praised the "Seven Deadly Sins" in this way.
Although there have been controversies in film reviews, there are praises and criticisms, which has also opened up the discussion around the "seven deadly sins" in full swing, but in general, many praises have become the main theme. In addition, In these contradictory but excellent evaluations, words of praise for actors can be seen everywhere.
Obviously, no one wants to miss the head-on showdown between Hugo and Brad.
Who played the murderer? What kind of sparks did the assignment and partnership of Morgan, Brad and Hugo spark out? The most important thing is that it is absolutely rare for Roger to call a "great" work. The last time the "Pulp Fiction" was praised as "great" is still influencing the trend of American culture, so this time What will happen?All this has become the most exciting topic after the release of "Seven Deadly Sins".Roger did not directly state the roles played by the three protagonists, but he was full of praise for the performance of the characters, which also stimulated the curiosity of the audience. Especially after the premiere, all the audience who participated in the premiere were silent. They refused to discuss the story and just repeatedly emphasized that "spoilers are not fun. You must enter the cinema to watch it yourself." This was originally true, but behind the audience's endless praise of the movie, it is a bit annoying: you always say that it looks good, but you don't say why it is, it is really curious and anxious!Obviously, the audience who participated in the premiere are proud of this effect. They enjoy the superiority of knowing the ending, and the irritability of other people, and they look forward to other audiences walking into the cinema to suffer. Glorious when frightened.Although there are also a small number of people who can't keep talking, spoilers in advance, but in the era when the Internet has not yet become popular, the dissemination of news is obviously in the hands of mainstream media, so the true ending is always a secret for most viewers. Almost all the media cooperated with the propaganda strategy of the "Seven Deadly Sins" crew and avoided talking about the final murderer, which also incited the audience's curiosity to a new high.What is even more annoying is that the media have all praised the movie!"U.S. Weekly" scored ninety, and said in the film review, "This is an interesting, shocking, shrewd, dirty, and very disturbing work-you may not like what you see Arrived, but you will definitely be affected by this story!"The content of this kind of comment is also unpredictable, "You may not like what you see"? But "U.S. Weekly" gave a high score of ninety points. Isn't this a contradiction? However, if you think about the profound social discussions triggered by the Los Angeles Times, it is not surprising: works that touch the sensitive nerves of society are never so easy to be likable, but no one can deny the profoundness and harmony of the film. Wonderful."Undoubtedly, this is a very'disgusting' work." The comments of the "Hollywood Reporter" are also very intriguing. Coupled with a high score of 88 points, it becomes more interesting and exciting. To arouse people's curiosity.The "New York Times" also joined the ranks, "Undoubtedly, this is a thought-provoking and thrilling work, but it is difficult for you to enjoy too much'pleasure' from the movie." Eighty-five points. The evaluation also gave a positive evaluation to the movie.It is worth noting that thriller and suspense movies are always difficult to please film critics, just as horror movies are always dubbed "crude" and action movies are always regarded as "empty plot", thriller and suspense movies Subject to its own subject matter, works with an average score of 60 points are no longer seen. For example, "The Silent Lamb" received an average score of 84 points that year. It is still a film history record, so this work is the last Also achieved a grand slam at the Oscars.Objectively speaking, there is still a gap between the "Seven Deadly Sins" and "The Silent Lambs" from the perspective of film technology, but even so, the "Seven Deadly Sins" still received such high evaluations from film critics, and many authoritative media gave them unanimously. With a score of more than eighty points, this becomes more and more rare.The "Wall Street Journal" gave an 80-point evaluation, and said in the comments, "The main story line in one go concealed many plot loopholes, but it still created a sensational, thought-provoking case, and the reflection after quiet. Become the greatest success of the film."In addition, the "San Francisco Chronicle" also scored 80 points, "This horror and suspense work is permeated with a disturbing and sick atmosphere from beginning to end."It can be seen from the many media reviews of the "Seven Deadly Sins" that the ratings of this thriller and suspense movie are bound to be incomparable with "Schindler's List", "Pulp Fiction", and "Before Sunrise". There was a lot of praise, and this work also ushered in a lot of controversy. It was originally a work with many contradictions. Even the media that praised the film used contradictory words as evaluations. Obviously, this It is a work that requires people to calm down, think slowly, and savor it carefully. This has led to huge differences in the media's views on the work, and the tumultuous discussion has pushed it to the peak of public opinion.The "San Francisco Chronicle" score is the lowest rating among the first batch of reviews. They believe that "the premise is that the film is indeed intriguing, but the whole work is slimy, wet, pretentious, and not at all shocking." So. The relentless film critics almost call the movie useless, but they still agree with the "intriguing" at the core of the movie's theme, which is indeed very intriguing."USA Today" has always had no cold with Hugo, and it is rare to see them express their appreciation for Hugo. This time is no exception. "Director David Fincher tried to create a more gloomy, depressed, and fearful atmosphere. Unearthed the deep psychological emotions of the serial killer beyond the dim and horrible style, but the result was self-defeating, the story was inappropriate, and the theme was vague."The 63-point evaluation also clearly shows the newspaper's attitude towards the "seven deadly sins".The "Houston Chronicle" also gave a score of 63. Their evaluation was the first batch of hot film reviews after the film premiere. As the top ten newspapers in national sales, its influence cannot be underestimated. Obviously they are The "seven deadly sins" are not cold either. "This is a lost sight-but a charming and attractive work that loses sight. Such a film full of first-class talents is forced to become an absurd hybrid. I can feel that the director is struggling to make the nonsense credible, but unfortunately, his efforts are still not enough."Interestingly, "USA Today", "Houston Chronicle" and "New York Post" are all leaders of the Block League, and the "San Francisco Chronicle" also joined the Block League once, but this time after the "Seven Deadly Sins" were released, The "New York Post" shut up unexpectedly. This was really unexpected. As a result, the "Houston Chronicle" replaced it and became the leader in criticizing the "Seven Deadly Sins.""The director tried to connect the whole story with religious beliefs. The dim and hopeless city streets, rainy weather, the old police officer's indifference to human feelings, and the tragic fateful ending. All these make people start to look at themselves and this society, mankind. Is it not possible to escape the fate of these seven deadly sins? From this point of view, the film is indeed impressive, but the theme and ideas that the film tries to express are too pale and weak.The seven deadly sins are actually the most basic human nature. If they are all sins, they are actually denying human nature itself, which is a fallacy of guilty of being born'. The most people in the movie seem to be guilty and deserve to be tried, but these are actually the extreme prejudices of the murderer's own wishful thinking.Human nature is not sin, but the extreme human nature is the source of sin. Most of our ordinary people are still far from that extreme humanity, and there is no need to rise to the height of judgment on ourselves. Instead, many times we should try to understand this nature.In the shaping of characters, it is obviously not the director's specialty.The veteran police officer's maturity and pessimism did not have enough details to pave the way. Except for an ex-girlfriend who mentioned it once, such a steady and weather-beaten person fell into confusion for such a simple reason, which was obviously too superficial. What's even more ridiculous is that the seemingly in-depth conversation between the old police officer and the young police officer in the bar actually impacted the old police officer's outlook on life, which seemed too simple.The personality of the young police officer is even more of a failure. In addition to impulse or impulse, such an impulsive character is unconvincing under the weak interpretation of the actor, and the emotional transition is too simple. The love between him and his wife is a few words. It is outlined in between, but it is still not enough to promote the plot.The murderer is even more so. In the limited time, he didn't even explain the background of the murderer. His seemingly godlike preaching was long and boring. After all, his self-proclaimed status was just a marginal man living in a dilapidated apartment. The plot tried its best to show the murderer's wit and cleverness, but it was obviously destroyed by the terrible ending.Of course, it is still a work worth discussing purely from the reflections caused by the film; but from the perspective of the degree of completion of the film, it is a failure. "The "Houston Chronicle" can be said to have severely criticized the movie, but still gave a rating of 63 points, which is in line with many points of view in its film review.The film review of the "Houston Chronicle" was criticized by the "Chicago Tribune", which many people did not expect, "This is a movie, not a'Reminiscence of a Water Year'."This is really uncontrollable. The "Chicago Tribune" means that the length of the movie is limited. The director uses enough details to outline the personality of the characters in the limited time. This is already very rare. The "Seven Deadly Sins" are true. The core idea is people's indifference to the reflection of society-and this has also been recognized by the "Houston Chronicle". As for the characters themselves, they completely need to be supported by the performance of the actors. From this point of view, the Chicago Tribune praised the "Seven Deadly Sins" in this way.Although there have been controversies in film reviews, there are praises and criticisms, which has also opened up the discussion around the "seven deadly sins" in full swing, but in general, many praises have become the main theme. In addition, In these contradictory but excellent evaluations, words of praise for actors can be seen everywhere.Obviously, no one wants to miss the head-on showdown between Hugo and Brad.
