Chapter 1890: First Comment Fanatic
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
"The New York Times" gave a 100 points, and said in the comments, "Seductive. Beautiful, ridiculous and distorted, mixed plot with wonderful performances, dedicated to this year's best movie, there is no one. "
"Wonderful and fascinating!" This is the "New Yorker" comment, short and incisive, but these two simple words are not enough to express their approval of the film, and 100 points became the second one. Argument.
The comments of the "San Francisco Chronicle" surprised many people. Before the film was released, they were not optimistic about the film’s box office prospects. They were even considered a provocation to Hugo’s current appeal. They have always been a nuisance in the past period of time, so everyone thought they would challenge the movie. But in fact, the "San Francisco Chronicle" not only failed to challenge, but sent a 100-point evaluation, which seems to confirm their objective and fair image of things and people.
"One of the most outstanding crime drama movies in the past ten years, undoubtedly an absolute masterpiece!"
Although the evaluation is not long, it is still a good word. At least for readers, the "San Francisco Chronicle" also voted for this movie.
"The Wall Street Journal" commented that, "Since'Chinatown ()', the most exciting, meticulous, meticulous, profound, and most delicious meal!" "Chinatown" won praise after it was released in 1974, and it won the Oscars that year. Won eleven nominations.
In addition, the "Wall Street Journal" also gave a perfect score of 100, which is the sixth full score among the first reviews of "L.A. Confidential".
The "Washington Post" increased the number of full marks to more than seven, and commented, "The viewing process of'L.A. Confidential' tells everyone: a movie that pleases everyone and is full of praise. How should it be filmed; and how wonderful and unforgettable the process of watching the movie is."
The "Chicago Tribune" film review became the most smiley exception among the first reviews, "This film is like a good bull's eye: carefully cooked, well-tempered, tender and juicy, absolutely Enjoy the taste. One more point is too old, one less point is too fishy!"
Such a metaphor is really interesting, and after the comments they added, "The whole film reveals an attitude, from the director to the screenwriter to the actor, the whole-hearted focus and dedication; the whole film projects a kind of emotion. , Including the frightening combination of punches. One blow after another, dazzling. There is no breathing room. But the most interesting part is that it gave up the secret of the devil with a bright smile."
"Chicago Tribune" continued their usual black humor style, and also ridiculed, "Lancaster once again sounded the clarion call to rule Hollywood: Oscar actor statuette, please pay attention, the robber Lancaster is coming." They also received a perfect score of 100 points and paid high tribute to the movie.
"U.S. Weekly" wrote a comment that said, "Perfect plot setting, perfect rhythm control, perfect performance mining. Everything is so perfect. The perfect Kevin Spacey meets the perfect Hugo Lankai Stewart, stand up and applaud, and extend my most honorable respect."
Such praise, and an incredible score of 100 points, made the number of full marks in the first batch of "L.A. Confidential" film reviews reached an astonishing nine!
Among the thirty-three first batch of film reviews, the full score was almost close to one-third. Such a ratio is really horrifying. but. When there is praise, there will naturally be criticism. Although the "San Francisco Chronicle" unexpectedly gave a full score affirmation, there are still voices of opposition.
The "New York Post" did not miss the opportunity and wrote a professional review for the first time, "A charming and outstanding entertainment work, which deeply excavates the heart of Hollywood **. At the same time, it has an extraordinary entertainment effect." "City Secret" paid tribute to the great noir films in the past, but after all, there was a lack of breath. The core excavation and the character creation were a sigh of relief. It is the biggest regret that the confrontation of the Communist Party did not meet the expectations."
As the most staunch opponent of Hugo for a long time in the past, the "New York Post" died after the "Seven Deadly Sins" and completely learned after "Independence Day." It’s not because Hugo’s current status cannot be challenged, on the contrary, any bit of lace news can become a topic of hype with a focus like Hugo—otherwise the publicity period of "Batman and Robin" will not be so smooth. It is Colin Mailer who clearly realizes that using Hugo is the right way, and whether it is negative news or positive news, benefits are eternal.
It's like the core of the "L.A. Confidential" story.
Therefore, although the "New York Post" still sang the opposite this time and gave the lowest score of 75 for the first batch of film reviews, in fact, the reviews still gave a lot of affirmation. In this way, although the "New York Post" cannot become a bird in the early stage, it can at least guarantee the bottom line of sales. It seems that the corresponding images of Colin's transformation can be found in "L.A. Secrets". Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
The "San Francisco Chronicle" gave one hundred points, while the "San Francisco Observer" only gave seventy-five points. Such a sharp contrast is also quite interesting. The latter said in film reviews, "This is the echo of'The...Sleep' and'The Maltese (The Maltese.)'-in a vast plain."
Both "Night Long Dream" and "Malta Eagle" are classic works from the 1940s, and can be regarded as the pinnacle of black detective films in film history. The "San Francisco Observer" compares "L.A. Confidential" with these two works. Obviously I just think that the gap in the middle is still very large, and that huge gap even makes it impossible for the echo to bounce back quickly.
Such a clever metaphor is also uncontrollable, but the 75-point evaluation still shows their attitude.
In addition, the score of "USA Today" is only 75 points. "The story is so complicated that the movie can't be told clearly. The loss of details makes the viewing process very mentally exhausting. But the movie is indeed full of tricks. The profound energy, and the wonderful performances from Kevin Spacey and Hugo Lancaster."
Three and seventy-five points are the lowest score among the first batch of film reviews. It can be seen from this that although some people still criticized the "L.A. Confidential", the score is still higher than 70 points, which is very rare for a drama movie.
To make a horizontal comparison, the first batch of 22 reviews of the "Seven Deadly Sins", but only 75 points in the media review, this film has caused countless discussions and controversies, especially with regard to David Fincher's shooting methods. Many doubts were raised; but relatively speaking, the narrative style of "L.A. Confidential" has received unanimous praise. It is not without reason that Nicholas compared this film with "The Godfather"-of course, "The Godfather" scored a perfect score of 100 in the fourteen media reviews. This is a record that no one can surpass so far, and "L.A. Confidential" is not good either.
However, compared with the "Seven Deadly Sins", the lowest score of "L.A. Confidential" is as high as 75 points-the same as the media review of the "Seven Deadly Sins", and the media review after the 33 comments is even higher. It is as high as ninety-three points. It can be seen that the overall quality of "L.A. Confidential" completely beats the "Seven Deadly Sins".
A joke from the "Chicago Tribune" caused a lot of secret laughs, "Fortunately, this time there is no Brad Pitt."
In addition, the media was full of praise for the performances of several leading actors of "L.A. Confidential". The duel between Hugo and Kevin became the focus of everyone’s most attention. The actor has dedicated one of the greatest rival dramas so far, and the performance power between gestures is amazing." "The change in the aura between Lancaster and Spacey almost guided the trend of the entire movie and flooded the work." With a kind of exciting charm", "Hugo's understatement, Kevin's ease of use, making performance into an art, making watching movies a kind of enjoyment", "Undoubtedly, Hugo Several rival plays with Kevin became the biggest highlight of the film, which deeply touched the soul", "Hugo and Kevin told a perfect and standard acting teaching experiment class: How to be in a limited space After completing the character creation, how to sparkle with the opponent actors"...
The sigh of the "New Yorker" is even more representative. "When Hugo meets Kevin, every frame of the movie becomes art, which is intoxicating." In the comments, they believe that the acting control of these two actors from the inside out has been on the verge of becoming, and it is enough to rise to the top of the hall.
In addition to Charlize’s a little bit of red from Charlize has also received much-anticipated treatment, "Delicate and sexual. Sensation, Theron has made the appearance of weapons to the extreme, vividly connected in series. The whole story", "The perfect combination of appearance and interior, and the broken soul behind the glamorous red lips, is so moving under Theron's interpretation", "The rivalry between Charlize and Hugo is undoubtedly on the Black Forest cake. Cherries, clap your hands and scream”, “Lynn played by Charlize is not only the most beautiful scenery in the whole story, but also the brightest hope in the entire dark society”, “complex, profound, fragile, sensitive, beautiful... Charlize’s Lynn has the ability to fascinate everyone"...
It can be seen that the media is full of praise for Charlize’s performance. In fact, it is not only that, Russell Crow, James Cromwell, David Strezern, Danny DeVito They are all highly praised, and what is even more incredible is that the media has noticed Heath Ledger for the first time!
Even the "New York Post", "San Francisco Observer", and "USA Today", apart from their criticisms, cannot deny that this is a very outstanding work. The completeness of the whole movie is amazing. The script, The actors, directors, photography and other links formed a perfect response, creating such an outstanding work.
"A great actor is an important magic weapon for the success of the whole movie! Every actor!" (To be continued. If you like this work, you are welcome to come)
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
"The New York Times" gave a 100 points, and said in the comments, "Seductive. Beautiful, ridiculous and distorted, mixed plot with wonderful performances, dedicated to this year's best movie, there is no one. "
"Wonderful and fascinating!" This is the "New Yorker" comment, short and incisive, but these two simple words are not enough to express their approval of the film, and 100 points became the second one. Argument.
The comments of the "San Francisco Chronicle" surprised many people. Before the film was released, they were not optimistic about the film’s box office prospects. They were even considered a provocation to Hugo’s current appeal. They have always been a nuisance in the past period of time, so everyone thought they would challenge the movie. But in fact, the "San Francisco Chronicle" not only failed to challenge, but sent a 100-point evaluation, which seems to confirm their objective and fair image of things and people.
"One of the most outstanding crime drama movies in the past ten years, undoubtedly an absolute masterpiece!"
Although the evaluation is not long, it is still a good word. At least for readers, the "San Francisco Chronicle" also voted for this movie.
"The Wall Street Journal" commented that, "Since'Chinatown ()', the most exciting, meticulous, meticulous, profound, and most delicious meal!" "Chinatown" won praise after it was released in 1974, and it won the Oscars that year. Won eleven nominations.
In addition, the "Wall Street Journal" also gave a perfect score of 100, which is the sixth full score among the first reviews of "L.A. Confidential".
The "Washington Post" increased the number of full marks to more than seven, and commented, "The viewing process of'L.A. Confidential' tells everyone: a movie that pleases everyone and is full of praise. How should it be filmed; and how wonderful and unforgettable the process of watching the movie is."
The "Chicago Tribune" film review became the most smiley exception among the first reviews, "This film is like a good bull's eye: carefully cooked, well-tempered, tender and juicy, absolutely Enjoy the taste. One more point is too old, one less point is too fishy!"
Such a metaphor is really interesting, and after the comments they added, "The whole film reveals an attitude, from the director to the screenwriter to the actor, the whole-hearted focus and dedication; the whole film projects a kind of emotion. , Including the frightening combination of punches. One blow after another, dazzling. There is no breathing room. But the most interesting part is that it gave up the secret of the devil with a bright smile."
"Chicago Tribune" continued their usual black humor style, and also ridiculed, "Lancaster once again sounded the clarion call to rule Hollywood: Oscar actor statuette, please pay attention, the robber Lancaster is coming." They also received a perfect score of 100 points and paid high tribute to the movie.
"U.S. Weekly" wrote a comment that said, "Perfect plot setting, perfect rhythm control, perfect performance mining. Everything is so perfect. The perfect Kevin Spacey meets the perfect Hugo Lankai Stewart, stand up and applaud, and extend my most honorable respect."
Such praise, and an incredible score of 100 points, made the number of full marks in the first batch of "L.A. Confidential" film reviews reached an astonishing nine!
Among the thirty-three first batch of film reviews, the full score was almost close to one-third. Such a ratio is really horrifying. but. When there is praise, there will naturally be criticism. Although the "San Francisco Chronicle" unexpectedly gave a full score affirmation, there are still voices of opposition.
The "New York Post" did not miss the opportunity and wrote a professional review for the first time, "A charming and outstanding entertainment work, which deeply excavates the heart of Hollywood **. At the same time, it has an extraordinary entertainment effect." "City Secret" paid tribute to the great noir films in the past, but after all, there was a lack of breath. The core excavation and the character creation were a sigh of relief. It is the biggest regret that the confrontation of the Communist Party did not meet the expectations."
As the most staunch opponent of Hugo for a long time in the past, the "New York Post" died after the "Seven Deadly Sins" and completely learned after "Independence Day." It’s not because Hugo’s current status cannot be challenged, on the contrary, any bit of lace news can become a topic of hype with a focus like Hugo—otherwise the publicity period of "Batman and Robin" will not be so smooth. It is Colin Mailer who clearly realizes that using Hugo is the right way, and whether it is negative news or positive news, benefits are eternal.
It's like the core of the "L.A. Confidential" story.
Therefore, although the "New York Post" still sang the opposite this time and gave the lowest score of 75 for the first batch of film reviews, in fact, the reviews still gave a lot of affirmation. In this way, although the "New York Post" cannot become a bird in the early stage, it can at least guarantee the bottom line of sales. It seems that the corresponding images of Colin's transformation can be found in "L.A. Secrets". Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
The "San Francisco Chronicle" gave one hundred points, while the "San Francisco Observer" only gave seventy-five points. Such a sharp contrast is also quite interesting. The latter said in film reviews, "This is the echo of'The...Sleep' and'The Maltese (The Maltese.)'-in a vast plain."
Both "Night Long Dream" and "Malta Eagle" are classic works from the 1940s, and can be regarded as the pinnacle of black detective films in film history. The "San Francisco Observer" compares "L.A. Confidential" with these two works. Obviously I just think that the gap in the middle is still very large, and that huge gap even makes it impossible for the echo to bounce back quickly.
Such a clever metaphor is also uncontrollable, but the 75-point evaluation still shows their attitude.
In addition, the score of "USA Today" is only 75 points. "The story is so complicated that the movie can't be told clearly. The loss of details makes the viewing process very mentally exhausting. But the movie is indeed full of tricks. The profound energy, and the wonderful performances from Kevin Spacey and Hugo Lancaster."
Three and seventy-five points are the lowest score among the first batch of film reviews. It can be seen from this that although some people still criticized the "L.A. Confidential", the score is still higher than 70 points, which is very rare for a drama movie.
To make a horizontal comparison, the first batch of 22 reviews of the "Seven Deadly Sins", but only 75 points in the media review, this film has caused countless discussions and controversies, especially with regard to David Fincher's shooting methods. Many doubts were raised; but relatively speaking, the narrative style of "L.A. Confidential" has received unanimous praise. It is not without reason that Nicholas compared this film with "The Godfather"-of course, "The Godfather" scored a perfect score of 100 in the fourteen media reviews. This is a record that no one can surpass so far, and "L.A. Confidential" is not good either.
However, compared with the "Seven Deadly Sins", the lowest score of "L.A. Confidential" is as high as 75 points-the same as the media review of the "Seven Deadly Sins", and the media review after the 33 comments is even higher. It is as high as ninety-three points. It can be seen that the overall quality of "L.A. Confidential" completely beats the "Seven Deadly Sins".
A joke from the "Chicago Tribune" caused a lot of secret laughs, "Fortunately, this time there is no Brad Pitt."
In addition, the media was full of praise for the performances of several leading actors of "L.A. Confidential". The duel between Hugo and Kevin became the focus of everyone’s most attention. The actor has dedicated one of the greatest rival dramas so far, and the performance power between gestures is amazing." "The change in the aura between Lancaster and Spacey almost guided the trend of the entire movie and flooded the work." With a kind of exciting charm", "Hugo's understatement, Kevin's ease of use, making performance into an art, making watching movies a kind of enjoyment", "Undoubtedly, Hugo Several rival plays with Kevin became the biggest highlight of the film, which deeply touched the soul", "Hugo and Kevin told a perfect and standard acting teaching experiment class: How to be in a limited space After completing the character creation, how to sparkle with the opponent actors"...
The sigh of the "New Yorker" is even more representative. "When Hugo meets Kevin, every frame of the movie becomes art, which is intoxicating." In the comments, they believe that the acting control of these two actors from the inside out has been on the verge of becoming, and it is enough to rise to the top of the hall.
In addition to Charlize’s a little bit of red from Charlize has also received much-anticipated treatment, "Delicate and sexual. Sensation, Theron has made the appearance of weapons to the extreme, vividly connected in series. The whole story", "The perfect combination of appearance and interior, and the broken soul behind the glamorous red lips, is so moving under Theron's interpretation", "The rivalry between Charlize and Hugo is undoubtedly on the Black Forest cake. Cherries, clap your hands and scream”, “Lynn played by Charlize is not only the most beautiful scenery in the whole story, but also the brightest hope in the entire dark society”, “complex, profound, fragile, sensitive, beautiful... Charlize’s Lynn has the ability to fascinate everyone"...
It can be seen that the media is full of praise for Charlize’s performance. In fact, it is not only that, Russell Crow, James Cromwell, David Strezern, Danny DeVito They are all highly praised, and what is even more incredible is that the media has noticed Heath Ledger for the first time!
Even the "New York Post", "San Francisco Observer", and "USA Today", apart from their criticisms, cannot deny that this is a very outstanding work. The completeness of the whole movie is amazing. The script, The actors, directors, photography and other links formed a perfect response, creating such an outstanding work.
"A great actor is an important magic weapon for the success of the whole movie! Every actor!" (To be continued. If you like this work, you are welcome to come)
"The New York Times" gave a 100 points, and said in the comments, "Seductive. Beautiful, ridiculous and distorted, mixed plot with wonderful performances, dedicated to this year's best movie, there is no one. ""Wonderful and fascinating!" This is the "New Yorker" comment, short and incisive, but these two simple words are not enough to express their approval of the film, and 100 points became the second one. Argument.The comments of the "San Francisco Chronicle" surprised many people. Before the film was released, they were not optimistic about the film's box office prospects. They were even considered a provocation to Hugo's current appeal. They have always been a nuisance in the past period of time, so everyone thought they would challenge the movie. But in fact, the "San Francisco Chronicle" not only failed to challenge, but sent a 100-point evaluation, which seems to confirm their objective and fair image of things and people."One of the most outstanding crime drama movies in the past ten years, undoubtedly an absolute masterpiece!"Although the evaluation is not long, it is still a good word. At least for readers, the "San Francisco Chronicle" also voted for this movie."The Wall Street Journal" commented that, "Since'Chinatown ', the most exciting, meticulous, meticulous, profound, and most delicious meal!" "Chinatown" won praise after it was released in 1974, and it won the Oscars that year. Won eleven nominations.In addition, the "Wall Street Journal" also gave a perfect score of 100, which is the sixth full score among the first reviews of "L.A. Confidential".The "Washington Post" increased the number of full marks to more than seven, and commented, "The viewing process of'L.A. Confidential' tells everyone: a movie that pleases everyone and is full of praise. How should it be filmed; and how wonderful and unforgettable the process of watching the movie is."The "Chicago Tribune" film review became the most smiley exception among the first reviews, "This film is like a good bull's eye: carefully cooked, well-tempered, tender and juicy, absolutely Enjoy the taste. One more point is too old, one less point is too fishy!"Such a metaphor is really interesting, and after the comments they added, "The whole film reveals an attitude, from the director to the screenwriter to the actor, the whole-hearted focus and dedication; the whole film projects a kind of emotion. , Including the frightening combination of punches. One blow after another, dazzling. There is no breathing room. But the most interesting part is that it gave up the secret of the devil with a bright smile.""Chicago Tribune" continued their usual black humor style, and also ridiculed, "Lancaster once again sounded the clarion call to rule Hollywood: Oscar actor statuette, please pay attention, the robber Lancaster is coming." They also received a perfect score of 100 points and paid high tribute to the movie."U.S. Weekly" wrote a comment that said, "Perfect plot setting, perfect rhythm control, perfect performance mining. Everything is so perfect. The perfect Kevin Spacey meets the perfect Hugo Lankai Stewart, stand up and applaud, and extend my most honorable respect."Such praise, and an incredible score of 100 points, made the number of full marks in the first batch of "L.A. Confidential" film reviews reached an astonishing nine!Among the thirty-three first batch of film reviews, the full score was almost close to one-third. Such a ratio is really horrifying. but. When there is praise, there will naturally be criticism. Although the "San Francisco Chronicle" unexpectedly gave a full score affirmation, there are still voices of opposition.The "New York Post" did not miss the opportunity and wrote a professional review for the first time, "A charming and outstanding entertainment work, which deeply excavates the heart of Hollywood **. At the same time, it has an extraordinary entertainment effect." "City Secret" paid tribute to the great noir films in the past, but after all, there was a lack of breath. The core excavation and the character creation were a sigh of relief. It is the biggest regret that the confrontation of the Communist Party did not meet the expectations."As the most staunch opponent of Hugo for a long time in the past, the "New York Post" died after the "Seven Deadly Sins" and completely learned after "Independence Day." It's not because Hugo's current status cannot be challenged, on the contrary, any bit of lace news can become a topic of hype with a focus like Hugootherwise the publicity period of "Batman and Robin" will not be so smooth. It is Colin Mailer who clearly realizes that using Hugo is the right way, and whether it is negative news or positive news, benefits are eternal.It's like the core of the "L.A. Confidential" story.Therefore, although the "New York Post" still sang the opposite this time and gave the lowest score of 75 for the first batch of film reviews, in fact, the reviews still gave a lot of affirmation. In this way, although the "New York Post" cannot become a bird in the early stage, it can at least guarantee the bottom line of sales. It seems that the corresponding images of Colin's transformation can be found in "L.A. Secrets". Is this a good thing or a bad thing?The "San Francisco Chronicle" gave one hundred points, while the "San Francisco Observer" only gave seventy-five points. Such a sharp contrast is also quite interesting. The latter said in film reviews, "This is the echo of'The...Sleep' and'The Maltese The Maltese.'-in a vast plain."Both "Night Long Dream" and "Malta Eagle" are classic works from the 1940s, and can be regarded as the pinnacle of black detective films in film history. The "San Francisco Observer" compares "L.A. Confidential" with these two works. Obviously I just think that the gap in the middle is still very large, and that huge gap even makes it impossible for the echo to bounce back quickly.Such a clever metaphor is also uncontrollable, but the 75-point evaluation still shows their attitude.In addition, the score of "USA Today" is only 75 points. "The story is so complicated that the movie can't be told clearly. The loss of details makes the viewing process very mentally exhausting. But the movie is indeed full of tricks. The profound energy, and the wonderful performances from Kevin Spacey and Hugo Lancaster."Three and seventy-five points are the lowest score among the first batch of film reviews. It can be seen from this that although some people still criticized the "L.A. Confidential", the score is still higher than 70 points, which is very rare for a drama movie.To make a horizontal comparison, the first batch of 22 reviews of the "Seven Deadly Sins", but only 75 points in the media review, this film has caused countless discussions and controversies, especially with regard to David Fincher's shooting methods. Many doubts were raised; but relatively speaking, the narrative style of "L.A. Confidential" has received unanimous praise. It is not without reason that Nicholas compared this film with "The Godfather"-of course, "The Godfather" scored a perfect score of 100 in the fourteen media reviews. This is a record that no one can surpass so far, and "L.A. Confidential" is not good either.However, compared with the "Seven Deadly Sins", the lowest score of "L.A. Confidential" is as high as 75 points-the same as the media review of the "Seven Deadly Sins", and the media review after the 33 comments is even higher. It is as high as ninety-three points. It can be seen that the overall quality of "L.A. Confidential" completely beats the "Seven Deadly Sins".A joke from the "Chicago Tribune" caused a lot of secret laughs, "Fortunately, this time there is no Brad Pitt."In addition, the media was full of praise for the performances of several leading actors of "L.A. Confidential". The duel between Hugo and Kevin became the focus of everyone's most attention. The actor has dedicated one of the greatest rival dramas so far, and the performance power between gestures is amazing." "The change in the aura between Lancaster and Spacey almost guided the trend of the entire movie and flooded the work." With a kind of exciting charm", "Hugo's understatement, Kevin's ease of use, making performance into an art, making watching movies a kind of enjoyment", "Undoubtedly, Hugo Several rival plays with Kevin became the biggest highlight of the film, which deeply touched the soul", "Hugo and Kevin told a perfect and standard acting teaching experiment class: How to be in a limited space After completing the character creation, how to sparkle with the opponent actors"...The sigh of the "New Yorker" is even more representative. "When Hugo meets Kevin, every frame of the movie becomes art, which is intoxicating." In the comments, they believe that the acting control of these two actors from the inside out has been on the verge of becoming, and it is enough to rise to the top of the hall.In addition to Charlize's a little bit of red from Charlize has also received much-anticipated treatment, "Delicate and sexual. Sensation, Theron has made the appearance of weapons to the extreme, vividly connected in series. The whole story", "The perfect combination of appearance and interior, and the broken soul behind the glamorous red lips, is so moving under Theron's interpretation", "The rivalry between Charlize and Hugo is undoubtedly on the Black Forest cake. Cherries, clap your hands and scream, Lynn played by Charlize is not only the most beautiful scenery in the whole story, but also the brightest hope in the entire dark society, complex, profound, fragile, sensitive, beautiful... Charlize's Lynn has the ability to fascinate everyone"...It can be seen that the media is full of praise for Charlize's performance. In fact, it is not only that, Russell Crow, James Cromwell, David Strezern, Danny DeVito They are all highly praised, and what is even more incredible is that the media has noticed Heath Ledger for the first time!Even the "New York Post", "San Francisco Observer", and "USA Today", apart from their criticisms, cannot deny that this is a very outstanding work. The completeness of the whole movie is amazing. The script, The actors, directors, photography and other links formed a perfect response, creating such an outstanding work."A great actor is an important magic weapon for the success of the whole movie! Every actor!" To be continued. If you like this work, you are welcome to come
