Chapter 2151: Screenwriting skills
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
The film review written by Nicholas for "Beautiful Mind" is clear and clear. Obviously, I can understand Hugo's original intention of creating this script, and he has the most thorough interpretation. At the end of the film review, Nicholas said so.
"The greatest success of this film lies in Hugo's adaptation of John Nash's biography. He hopes to tell not a real John Nash, but a real schizophrenic patient. This makes the whole movie circulate. With the warm humanistic care, the touch that makes the soul tremble gently is carried through.
Different from the coldness of "Death Convict's Walk" and the cruelty of "Schindler's List", the "Beautiful Mind" brings warmth.
The collaboration between Hugo and Charlize has caused a strong chemical reaction in the film. The two most topical and influential actors today have worked together for the first time since the announcement of their relationship. They not only show two Personal superb and profound acting skills burst out amazing sparks. With incredible tacit understanding, the consistent emotions show a moving spirit. Almost every picture and every scene of the game is like a work of art. People were amazed again and again.
It is hard to say whether it is the love between John and Alicia that made this classic collaboration, or the love between Hugo and Charlize that made the movie so wonderful. But there is no doubt that the collaboration of these two actors goes beyond ‘before sunrise’, reminiscent of ‘when Harry meets Sally’. "
Even at the end of the film review, Nicholas did not forget to tease Hugo and Charlize, which is really dumbfounding. However, the "Los Angeles Times"'s admiration for this work is unquestionable, and a 100-point evaluation is enough to be eye-catching, which is really a super high praise.
This time, the "New Yorker" stood up for the first time and agreed with the views of the Los Angeles Times. They also gave a one-hundred-point evaluation and praised the work in film reviews, especially Adaptation work for Hugo.
"Hugo Lancaster once again dedicated his amazing adaptation work, showing his outstanding screenwriting talent.
The structure of the whole movie is compact and complete, there is no extra plot, and no extra details. Almost every minute part can be echoed successively. The overall rhythm control is even a master, from the first quarter of the time. Game theory quickly enters the theme, advances to the middle half of the emotional layer, and then to the final quarter of sublimation and precipitation, telling such a true biography full of human care with meticulous, delicate, vivid and true brushwork. .
Hugo did not follow the real life of John Nash, but made a second creation of the story. This is not an "adaptation" but a "creation". This may be a point that many people criticize-disrespect for reality, but It is precisely the biggest highlight of the whole movie. It can be seen from one detail: Hugo carefully set up the three illusion characters of John, perfected and supplemented the whole story and John Nash, which is a part that cannot be seen in real life. But while making the whole movie closer to reality, it is also more exciting!
The appearance of Charles is a character created by John in order to relieve his inner anxiety about failure. He appeared after John encountered long-term bottlenecks, continuous failures and deep despair. Charles’s personality is almost the opposite of John’s, but he is constantly affirming John, encourage John and admit that John is a genius. This is undoubtedly the most important self-affirmation for the lonely and helpless John.
In fact, this can also be regarded as John's unconscious self-treatment. All his emotions, whether positive or negative, are vented through Charles who is outgoing and cheerful. Therefore, Charles has always been John's best friend, even the only friend, and Charles has contributed to John's success.
The second personality that appears is William. This is the personality condensed by John's desire for success. It is also the definition of career, hero, and success in John's heart, or the life bred by the negative emotions in John's heart. Therefore, William is savage, rude, bossy, strong, greedy, calm, determined, cunning... It can be said that he grasped all the thoughts in John's heart accurately, and firmly controlled John's every move.
The emergence of William is based on the background of the times and the social environment. In the turbulent historical conditions, as a mathematician, John was always depressed. He published game theory, but he could not truly be famous in the world. He longed for Become a hero who has the ability to change the direction of war, so he became a secret spy who deciphered the Soviet code.
The last personality that appeared was the little girl Marcy. In fact, she was John’s inner self-projection-first of all, a girl who did not have the ability to resist the violence and cruelty of the outside world. He was just a math without the power of a chicken. Home is just like a girl; secondly, Marcy has a miserable life experience, lonely and helpless, pitiful, longing for the care and love of others. Deviated from the name of a genius in the field of mathematics, John is such a simple and fragile child, who is always looking for a haven of soul, but has to wander around.
Charles represents John’s inferiority and self-confidence, William represents John’s fear and strength, and Marcy represents John’s fragility and loneliness... These three fictional characters are constantly entangled with John’s self, so that John gradually loses. The self in society. The principles of reason and reality are drifting away from the schizophrenic John. The spur of these three characters made John almost crazy in semiotic research. John’s achievements are closely related to these three characters, but in these achievements Behind the scenes, John gradually lost himself, and finally broke out completely.
In the process of watching the movie, the audience can't tell which are the real characters. The blinded eyes make the illusion completely out of control, as if every audience has also entered John's world, gradually lost in the blur between illusion and reality. In the zone.
The three imaginary characters allude to John’s confusion and helplessness, which also makes Alicia’s existence very important-and then leads to the core theme of the movie: true trust can make mental illness no longer terrible, and love is built The bridge is the key to getting out of the predicament.
It was Alicia who guided John out of the predicament step by step. She made Nash realize that in the midst of nothingness and illusion, at least their love is real and their heartbeat is real. This point of real emotion is like one. This kind of fire brought reason back to Nash's consciousness. Trust and love built a bridge between John's unconsciousness and reason, and eventually became an opportunity for John's recovery. The warmth Alicia brought to John allowed him to defeat himself and complete a breakthrough.
This echoed the three fictional characters, making the whole story complete-even Hugo used a small amount of pen and ink to create an incredible effect in friendship. Two partners in the research room, Binda, Sol, and competitor Martin. The story begins with the encounter between John and them, and finally ends with the acquaintance of John and Martin. The emotional brewing is further fermented, and finally the core idea of the whole film is explained. : Trust and care are the only key and the best medicine.
In many film works, mental illness is always forced into the corner, linked to abnormality, madness, and loss of control, but in the "beautiful mind", it is just a disease, the simplest disease, which can exhaust life. disease. Perhaps this is the beautiful mind described by Hugo Lancaster.
As a screenwriter, Hugo is using his brushwork to change the world. And this time, he did it. "
The comments of the "New Yorker" showed a completely different perspective. A large-scale analysis of the movie's script was carried out, and it was obvious that he was full of praise for Hugo's work.
For the "New Yorker" view, the "New York Times" and the "Washington Post" both expressed their recognition. The former even believed that Hugo gave the whole script amazing sparks and energy, even if it was regarded as an original script. any problem. And this work is very hopeful to bring Hugo his second screenwriter, the Little Golden Man. This is undoubtedly one of the greatest affirmations of Hugo.
Following the "Sixth Sense of Supernatural", the "Beautiful Mind" that debuted at the end of the year almost occupied the hearts of film critics without any suspense. This is a result that everyone expected, not reconciled.
Different from "Trumen's World", "The Sixth Sense of Supernatural Beautiful Mind" can be said to be the works most in line with the academic aesthetic point of view, not to mention that Hugo has returned to the plot he is most familiar and good at. The subject matter has become a guarantee of quality, which made the film be favored by countless film critics before it was released, and they believed that Hugo would dedicate another masterpiece.
As for how high this masterpiece can reach, and whether it can regain the brilliance of "Death Row" or even "Schindler's List", it still depends on the quality of the finished product.
However, due to the rise of the "against Hugo" wave, people have begun to reject the continuous praise of Hugo, and even hate such a practice. When the "Sixth Sense of Supernatural" is released, this deep malice can be felt, which also makes Many people think that the wave of praise for the "beautiful mind" will be slightly reduced. Even with praise, people will retain a little attitude, and may even ignore the excellent work of this work.
But the result was unexpected. The outstanding quality of the finished product of "Beautiful Mind" was almost impossible for film critics to refuse. Even if they "hate" Hugo, they can't open their eyes to talk nonsense and turn the good into bad-not to mention, they are Hugo's success has long been taken for granted, and can only be sighed with a wry smile: the boring guy did it again, and once again convinced everyone with the absolutely outstanding quality.
Therefore, after the "Beautiful Mind" movie in eleven theaters, the first batch of reviews unexpectedly ushered in a frenzy of praise again!
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
The film review written by Nicholas for "Beautiful Mind" is clear and clear. Obviously, I can understand Hugo's original intention of creating this script, and he has the most thorough interpretation. At the end of the film review, Nicholas said so.
"The greatest success of this film lies in Hugo's adaptation of John Nash's biography. He hopes to tell not a real John Nash, but a real schizophrenic patient. This makes the whole movie circulate. With the warm humanistic care, the touch that makes the soul tremble gently is carried through.
Different from the coldness of "Death Convict's Walk" and the cruelty of "Schindler's List", the "Beautiful Mind" brings warmth.
The collaboration between Hugo and Charlize has caused a strong chemical reaction in the film. The two most topical and influential actors today have worked together for the first time since the announcement of their relationship. They not only show two Personal superb and profound acting skills burst out amazing sparks. With incredible tacit understanding, the consistent emotions show a moving spirit. Almost every picture and every scene of the game is like a work of art. People were amazed again and again.
It is hard to say whether it is the love between John and Alicia that made this classic collaboration, or the love between Hugo and Charlize that made the movie so wonderful. But there is no doubt that the collaboration of these two actors goes beyond ‘before sunrise’, reminiscent of ‘when Harry meets Sally’. "
Even at the end of the film review, Nicholas did not forget to tease Hugo and Charlize, which is really dumbfounding. However, the "Los Angeles Times"'s admiration for this work is unquestionable, and a 100-point evaluation is enough to be eye-catching, which is really a super high praise.
This time, the "New Yorker" stood up for the first time and agreed with the views of the Los Angeles Times. They also gave a one-hundred-point evaluation and praised the work in film reviews, especially Adaptation work for Hugo.
"Hugo Lancaster once again dedicated his amazing adaptation work, showing his outstanding screenwriting talent.
The structure of the whole movie is compact and complete, there is no extra plot, and no extra details. Almost every minute part can be echoed successively. The overall rhythm control is even a master, from the first quarter of the time. Game theory quickly enters the theme, advances to the middle half of the emotional layer, and then to the final quarter of sublimation and precipitation, telling such a true biography full of human care with meticulous, delicate, vivid and true brushwork. .
Hugo did not follow the real life of John Nash, but made a second creation of the story. This is not an "adaptation" but a "creation". This may be a point that many people criticize-disrespect for reality, but It is precisely the biggest highlight of the whole movie. It can be seen from one detail: Hugo carefully set up the three illusion characters of John, perfected and supplemented the whole story and John Nash, which is a part that cannot be seen in real life. But while making the whole movie closer to reality, it is also more exciting!
The appearance of Charles is a character created by John in order to relieve his inner anxiety about failure. He appeared after John encountered long-term bottlenecks, continuous failures and deep despair. Charles’s personality is almost the opposite of John’s, but he is constantly affirming John, encourage John and admit that John is a genius. This is undoubtedly the most important self-affirmation for the lonely and helpless John.
In fact, this can also be regarded as John's unconscious self-treatment. All his emotions, whether positive or negative, are vented through Charles who is outgoing and cheerful. Therefore, Charles has always been John's best friend, even the only friend, and Charles has contributed to John's success.
The second personality that appears is William. This is the personality condensed by John's desire for success. It is also the definition of career, hero, and success in John's heart, or the life bred by the negative emotions in John's heart. Therefore, William is savage, rude, bossy, strong, greedy, calm, determined, cunning... It can be said that he grasped all the thoughts in John's heart accurately, and firmly controlled John's every move.
The emergence of William is based on the background of the times and the social environment. In the turbulent historical conditions, as a mathematician, John was always depressed. He published game theory, but he could not truly be famous in the world. He longed for Become a hero who has the ability to change the direction of war, so he became a secret spy who deciphered the Soviet code.
The last personality that appeared was the little girl Marcy. In fact, she was John’s inner self-projection-first of all, a girl who did not have the ability to resist the violence and cruelty of the outside world. He was just a math without the power of a chicken. Home is just like a girl; secondly, Marcy has a miserable life experience, lonely and helpless, pitiful, longing for the care and love of others. Deviated from the name of a genius in the field of mathematics, John is such a simple and fragile child, who is always looking for a haven of soul, but has to wander around.
Charles represents John’s inferiority and self-confidence, William represents John’s fear and strength, and Marcy represents John’s fragility and loneliness... These three fictional characters are constantly entangled with John’s self, so that John gradually loses. The self in society. The principles of reason and reality are drifting away from the schizophrenic John. The spur of these three characters made John almost crazy in semiotic research. John’s achievements are closely related to these three characters, but in these achievements Behind the scenes, John gradually lost himself, and finally broke out completely.
In the process of watching the movie, the audience can't tell which are the real characters. The blinded eyes make the illusion completely out of control, as if every audience has also entered John's world, gradually lost in the blur between illusion and reality. In the zone.
The three imaginary characters allude to John’s confusion and helplessness, which also makes Alicia’s existence very important-and then leads to the core theme of the movie: true trust can make mental illness no longer terrible, and love is built The bridge is the key to getting out of the predicament.
It was Alicia who guided John out of the predicament step by step. She made Nash realize that in the midst of nothingness and illusion, at least their love is real and their heartbeat is real. This point of real emotion is like one. This kind of fire brought reason back to Nash's consciousness. Trust and love built a bridge between John's unconsciousness and reason, and eventually became an opportunity for John's recovery. The warmth Alicia brought to John allowed him to defeat himself and complete a breakthrough.
This echoed the three fictional characters, making the whole story complete-even Hugo used a small amount of pen and ink to create an incredible effect in friendship. Two partners in the research room, Binda, Sol, and competitor Martin. The story begins with the encounter between John and them, and finally ends with the acquaintance of John and Martin. The emotional brewing is further fermented, and finally the core idea of the whole film is explained. : Trust and care are the only key and the best medicine.
In many film works, mental illness is always forced into the corner, linked to abnormality, madness, and loss of control, but in the "beautiful mind", it is just a disease, the simplest disease, which can exhaust life. disease. Perhaps this is the beautiful mind described by Hugo Lancaster.
As a screenwriter, Hugo is using his brushwork to change the world. And this time, he did it. "
The comments of the "New Yorker" showed a completely different perspective. A large-scale analysis of the movie's script was carried out, and it was obvious that he was full of praise for Hugo's work.
For the "New Yorker" view, the "New York Times" and the "Washington Post" both expressed their recognition. The former even believed that Hugo gave the whole script amazing sparks and energy, even if it was regarded as an original script. any problem. And this work is very hopeful to bring Hugo his second screenwriter, the Little Golden Man. This is undoubtedly one of the greatest affirmations of Hugo.
Following the "Sixth Sense of Supernatural", the "Beautiful Mind" that debuted at the end of the year almost occupied the hearts of film critics without any suspense. This is a result that everyone expected, not reconciled.
Different from "Trumen's World", "The Sixth Sense of Supernatural Beautiful Mind" can be said to be the works most in line with the academic aesthetic point of view, not to mention that Hugo has returned to the plot he is most familiar and good at. The subject matter has become a guarantee of quality, which made the film be favored by countless film critics before it was released, and they believed that Hugo would dedicate another masterpiece.
As for how high this masterpiece can reach, and whether it can regain the brilliance of "Death Row" or even "Schindler's List", it still depends on the quality of the finished product.
However, due to the rise of the "against Hugo" wave, people have begun to reject the continuous praise of Hugo, and even hate such a practice. When the "Sixth Sense of Supernatural" is released, this deep malice can be felt, which also makes Many people think that the wave of praise for the "beautiful mind" will be slightly reduced. Even with praise, people will retain a little attitude, and may even ignore the excellent work of this work.
But the result was unexpected. The outstanding quality of the finished product of "Beautiful Mind" was almost impossible for film critics to refuse. Even if they "hate" Hugo, they can't open their eyes to talk nonsense and turn the good into bad-not to mention, they are Hugo's success has long been taken for granted, and can only be sighed with a wry smile: the boring guy did it again, and once again convinced everyone with the absolutely outstanding quality.
Therefore, after the "Beautiful Mind" movie in eleven theaters, the first batch of reviews unexpectedly ushered in a frenzy of praise again!
The film review written by Nicholas for "Beautiful Mind" is clear and clear. Obviously, I can understand Hugo's original intention of creating this script, and he has the most thorough interpretation. At the end of the film review, Nicholas said so."The greatest success of this film lies in Hugo's adaptation of John Nash's biography. He hopes to tell not a real John Nash, but a real schizophrenic patient. This makes the whole movie circulate. With the warm humanistic care, the touch that makes the soul tremble gently is carried through.Different from the coldness of "Death Convict's Walk" and the cruelty of "Schindler's List", the "Beautiful Mind" brings warmth.The collaboration between Hugo and Charlize has caused a strong chemical reaction in the film. The two most topical and influential actors today have worked together for the first time since the announcement of their relationship. They not only show two Personal superb and profound acting skills burst out amazing sparks. With incredible tacit understanding, the consistent emotions show a moving spirit. Almost every picture and every scene of the game is like a work of art. People were amazed again and again.It is hard to say whether it is the love between John and Alicia that made this classic collaboration, or the love between Hugo and Charlize that made the movie so wonderful. But there is no doubt that the collaboration of these two actors goes beyond before sunrise', reminiscent of when Harry meets Sally'. "Even at the end of the film review, Nicholas did not forget to tease Hugo and Charlize, which is really dumbfounding. However, the "Los Angeles Times"'s admiration for this work is unquestionable, and a 100-point evaluation is enough to be eye-catching, which is really a super high praise.This time, the "New Yorker" stood up for the first time and agreed with the views of the Los Angeles Times. They also gave a one-hundred-point evaluation and praised the work in film reviews, especially Adaptation work for Hugo."Hugo Lancaster once again dedicated his amazing adaptation work, showing his outstanding screenwriting talent.The structure of the whole movie is compact and complete, there is no extra plot, and no extra details. Almost every minute part can be echoed successively. The overall rhythm control is even a master, from the first quarter of the time. Game theory quickly enters the theme, advances to the middle half of the emotional layer, and then to the final quarter of sublimation and precipitation, telling such a true biography full of human care with meticulous, delicate, vivid and true brushwork. .Hugo did not follow the real life of John Nash, but made a second creation of the story. This is not an "adaptation" but a "creation". This may be a point that many people criticize-disrespect for reality, but It is precisely the biggest highlight of the whole movie. It can be seen from one detail: Hugo carefully set up the three illusion characters of John, perfected and supplemented the whole story and John Nash, which is a part that cannot be seen in real life. But while making the whole movie closer to reality, it is also more exciting!The appearance of Charles is a character created by John in order to relieve his inner anxiety about failure. He appeared after John encountered long-term bottlenecks, continuous failures and deep despair. Charles's personality is almost the opposite of John's, but he is constantly affirming John, encourage John and admit that John is a genius. This is undoubtedly the most important self-affirmation for the lonely and helpless John.In fact, this can also be regarded as John's unconscious self-treatment. All his emotions, whether positive or negative, are vented through Charles who is outgoing and cheerful. Therefore, Charles has always been John's best friend, even the only friend, and Charles has contributed to John's success.The second personality that appears is William. This is the personality condensed by John's desire for success. It is also the definition of career, hero, and success in John's heart, or the life bred by the negative emotions in John's heart. Therefore, William is savage, rude, bossy, strong, greedy, calm, determined, cunning... It can be said that he grasped all the thoughts in John's heart accurately, and firmly controlled John's every move.The emergence of William is based on the background of the times and the social environment. In the turbulent historical conditions, as a mathematician, John was always depressed. He published game theory, but he could not truly be famous in the world. He longed for Become a hero who has the ability to change the direction of war, so he became a secret spy who deciphered the Soviet code.The last personality that appeared was the little girl Marcy. In fact, she was John's inner self-projection-first of all, a girl who did not have the ability to resist the violence and cruelty of the outside world. He was just a math without the power of a chicken. Home is just like a girl; secondly, Marcy has a miserable life experience, lonely and helpless, pitiful, longing for the care and love of others. Deviated from the name of a genius in the field of mathematics, John is such a simple and fragile child, who is always looking for a haven of soul, but has to wander around.Charles represents John's inferiority and self-confidence, William represents John's fear and strength, and Marcy represents John's fragility and loneliness... These three fictional characters are constantly entangled with John's self, so that John gradually loses. The self in society. The principles of reason and reality are drifting away from the schizophrenic John. The spur of these three characters made John almost crazy in semiotic research. John's achievements are closely related to these three characters, but in these achievements Behind the scenes, John gradually lost himself, and finally broke out completely.In the process of watching the movie, the audience can't tell which are the real characters. The blinded eyes make the illusion completely out of control, as if every audience has also entered John's world, gradually lost in the blur between illusion and reality. In the zone.The three imaginary characters allude to John's confusion and helplessness, which also makes Alicia's existence very important-and then leads to the core theme of the movie: true trust can make mental illness no longer terrible, and love is built The bridge is the key to getting out of the predicament.It was Alicia who guided John out of the predicament step by step. She made Nash realize that in the midst of nothingness and illusion, at least their love is real and their heartbeat is real. This point of real emotion is like one. This kind of fire brought reason back to Nash's consciousness. Trust and love built a bridge between John's unconsciousness and reason, and eventually became an opportunity for John's recovery. The warmth Alicia brought to John allowed him to defeat himself and complete a breakthrough.This echoed the three fictional characters, making the whole story complete-even Hugo used a small amount of pen and ink to create an incredible effect in friendship. Two partners in the research room, Binda, Sol, and competitor Martin. The story begins with the encounter between John and them, and finally ends with the acquaintance of John and Martin. The emotional brewing is further fermented, and finally the core idea of the whole film is explained. : Trust and care are the only key and the best medicine.In many film works, mental illness is always forced into the corner, linked to abnormality, madness, and loss of control, but in the "beautiful mind", it is just a disease, the simplest disease, which can exhaust life. disease. Perhaps this is the beautiful mind described by Hugo Lancaster.As a screenwriter, Hugo is using his brushwork to change the world. And this time, he did it. "The comments of the "New Yorker" showed a completely different perspective. A large-scale analysis of the movie's script was carried out, and it was obvious that he was full of praise for Hugo's work.For the "New Yorker" view, the "New York Times" and the "Washington Post" both expressed their recognition. The former even believed that Hugo gave the whole script amazing sparks and energy, even if it was regarded as an original script. any problem. And this work is very hopeful to bring Hugo his second screenwriter, the Little Golden Man. This is undoubtedly one of the greatest affirmations of Hugo.Following the "Sixth Sense of Supernatural", the "Beautiful Mind" that debuted at the end of the year almost occupied the hearts of film critics without any suspense. This is a result that everyone expected, not reconciled.Different from "Trumen's World", "The Sixth Sense of Supernatural Beautiful Mind" can be said to be the works most in line with the academic aesthetic point of view, not to mention that Hugo has returned to the plot he is most familiar and good at. The subject matter has become a guarantee of quality, which made the film be favored by countless film critics before it was released, and they believed that Hugo would dedicate another masterpiece.As for how high this masterpiece can reach, and whether it can regain the brilliance of "Death Row" or even "Schindler's List", it still depends on the quality of the finished product.However, due to the rise of the "against Hugo" wave, people have begun to reject the continuous praise of Hugo, and even hate such a practice. When the "Sixth Sense of Supernatural" is released, this deep malice can be felt, which also makes Many people think that the wave of praise for the "beautiful mind" will be slightly reduced. Even with praise, people will retain a little attitude, and may even ignore the excellent work of this work.But the result was unexpected. The outstanding quality of the finished product of "Beautiful Mind" was almost impossible for film critics to refuse. Even if they "hate" Hugo, they can't open their eyes to talk nonsense and turn the good into bad-not to mention, they are Hugo's success has long been taken for granted, and can only be sighed with a wry smile: the boring guy did it again, and once again convinced everyone with the absolutely outstanding quality.Therefore, after the "Beautiful Mind" movie in eleven theaters, the first batch of reviews unexpectedly ushered in a frenzy of praise again!
