Chapter 2152: Pinnacle
If audio player doesn't work, press Stop then Play button again
Among the first comments, the "Hollywood Reporter" focused on Hugo's outstanding performance.
"John Nash is a great challenge for any actor. Just by seeing the life of this character, you can predict that this will be a character who hopes to show his abilities. Genius or lunatic. , This is always the most suitable role for actors, from'Mozart' to'The Silent Lamb', from'The Silent Lamb' to'Taxi Driver', from'Schindler's List' to the'Seven Deadly Sins'...... Among these classic works, we can always see actors in the role of genius or lunatic, showing their acting talents and talents vividly and vividly.
John Nash is both a genius and a lunatic.
So, when this story appeared in sight, everyone knew that it would be a grand acting carnival. However, people have overlooked one thing. When there are too many opportunities to show off, it is easy to lose the rhythm. The performance injects too much energy or the interpretation is too forceful. As a result, the movie becomes a stage play, and the exaggerated effect is disappointing.
For a genius and lunatic, how to accurately grasp the rhythm and proportions is a daunting challenge for any actor. Even Dustin Hoffman in "Rain Man", even Jeffrey Rush in "Shining Style", they can hardly be accurate. But Hugo Lancaster did it.
Hugo rejected every opportunity to overplay the role. He showed strong and precise control. With his extraordinary concentration, he showed us a person who lives almost completely in his inner world. The dramatic display of the character’s psychology is perfectly handled: a vague smile on the lips, the occasional awkward and awkward hand movements, the erratic voice of the speech, the vague tone of southern accent, flickering but bright Concentrated eyes, awkwardly staggering footsteps... With Hugo’s performance, you don’t think this is intentional by the actor, and you don’t feel the power of performance or carving at all. Instead, you think it’s after a deep absorption of the character’s personality. Spread out naturally.
The most memorable scene was that after John Nash learned the truth, he fell into a breakdown in disbelief, and then cut his left hand with his nail to try to find the implanted chip inside, but he failed. When he raised his head, the shock, despair, consternation and collapse in his pupils shocked his soul!
Eyes, facial expressions, gestures, postures, speaking, walking... and even a gesture of bowing one's head can feel the deep shock. Hugo's understanding and interpretation of the character is so perfect that any language of praise loses its color . There is no doubt that Hugo has dedicated the best performance of his career-even after he has dedicated many amazing performances.
Had it not been for Hugo in March this year to just rely on the "Trumen's World" to win his second Oscar, the actor Golden Man, and once again made history, we can almost claim that there will be no battle for the next Oscar for the best actor. suspense. But even so, the performance that can be recorded in the annals of "Beautiful Mind" still gives Hugo the opportunity to continue to make history at the Oscars, which makes Hugo stand in the position of Marlon Brando, Jack Nicholson, Jack Lemmon's height, and half the lead.
Driven by Hugo’s brilliant performances, Charlize Theron has dedicated an award-winning performance for the third consecutive year. Alicia’s temperament ranges from cunning and agile to heavy and difficult to perseverance and maturity. The whole process of transformation was performed delicately and movingly by Charlize, especially the chemical reaction between her and Hugo was carried out throughout, which was called the key to the success of the whole movie.
William Pacher, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, has once again seen the performance spirit of this young actor after a long time. He is calm and domineering, complex and cunning, strong and insidious, and clever tongue. He is free from acting crutches. After that, Leonardo showed the charming charm of the performance, using subtle changes in his eyes to take the role to a whole new level.
There is also Charles played by Heath Ledger, Rosen played by Christopher Plummer, Hansen played by Josh Lucas (.)...Everyone has dedicated a performance that cannot be ignored, making the whole movie change It has to be complete. This is undoubtedly a wonderful work, and the outstanding performance of a group of actors makes the work one of the classics. "
The views of the "Hollywood Reporter" are undoubtedly very novel. They regarded this work as the pinnacle of Hugo. This is really beyond the expectations of many people-everyone knows that Hugo has already been before this. Dedicated many wonderful performances, otherwise he would not exceed Tom Hanks and other two Goldman winners, and Jack Nicholson is ranked as the actor with the most Oscar acting trophies.
As the most authoritative professional magazine on the West Coast, the point of view of the "Hollywood Reporter" is very important. They once again gave a perfect score of 100, which undoubtedly pushed the praise of "Beautiful Mind" to a brand new peak.
In fact, in addition to the "Los Angeles Times," "The New Yorker," and the "Hollywood Reporter," two other media outlets gave a perfect score of 100, namely the Chicago Sun and the Rolling Stones.
Roger Ebert’s "Chicago Sun" not only gave one hundred points, but also gave a recommendation of four stars. To the extreme, he constructed the character’s personality with the behavior details one after another. He awakened the vitality of the character, once again brought breathtaking performances, and made the whole viewing process follow the ups and downs of the character. Sadness and joy overlap."
The full score of "Rolling Stone" was beyond everyone's expectation. This magazine, which has never been too cold with Hugo, did not stingy with his compliments this time. A love story like a fairy tale conveys the courage to go deep into the bones!"
Five full marks undoubtedly make the praise of "Beautiful Mind" reach its peak. What's even more incredible is that several media think this work can be called Hugo's pinnacle work. This is really everyone. Unexpected situation, especially after Hugo just won his second Oscar winner.
Roger Ebert's film reviews can be seen, he gave 100 points to Hugo's performance.
In addition, "USA Today" gave an eighty-eight point, "This is an encouraging film, which perfectly digests a very difficult subject-more than "shiny style" Excellent, this may be the most influential film among all the films that have defeated the spirit demons."
The "Daily News" evaluated 95 points, "Unfortunately, Howard stuck to the rules in the last third of the film, using old-fashioned structures and tear-gas methods to ruin a true and chewy story that is easy to understand. . But before that, you will be intently."
It can be seen that these works that used to be at odds with Hugo have all praised the film one after another, even far exceeding expectations. Only the "New York Post" gave 65 points, "For the film "Beautiful Mind", there will always be more praise and admiration than you might have guessed, but it has not exceeded the belief of its creators. When the film When it does succeed, even though it may not be great on its own, people always do it."
The score given by the "New York Post" was also the lowest score among the first batch of comments. In addition, there was a lot of applause.
"The Wall Street Journal" scored ninety-three points, "Lon Howard and Hugo Lancaster gave the original novel a new life, and added a little Hollywood-style sadness, but there is no doubt that Lancaster's brilliant performance Light up the whole work."
The "Chicago Tribune" once again gave an interesting comment behind the 88-point evaluation, "For someone who has just relied on'Trumen's World' to win an Oscar and is the third gold medalist in five years. For human actors, the'beautiful mind' is undoubtedly the most severe, deepest and most difficult challenge. He does not need to prove his strength, but he needs to prove that he deserves the award. There is no doubt that he did it. When it comes, and far beyond expectations, he can almost say that he has finished this test and delivered the peak performance of his career. It is nothing to say!"
At the end of the comment, the "Chicago Tribune" also teased, "Maybe it is not the pinnacle of work-because we all know that the best work is always the next one."
I have to say that the ridicule of the "Chicago Tribune" is always the best remedy for people after dinner Among the first comments of "Beautiful Mind", 33 media gathered and praised it. The sound occupies an absolute advantage. In the end, the media review reached an excellent 89 points, which far exceeded the reputation of the recent word-of-mouth work "The Sixth Sense of Spirituality", which was born at the end of the year with an absolutely strong posture.
However, even with such excellent results, for Hugo, people have long been used to it-some people even think that this score is lower than expected. Eighty-nine points? Lower than expected? I have to say that now people's ultra-high standards for Hugo have reached a perverted level. But even more frightening is that, even so, Hugo can still surprise people again every time!
Although "Beautiful Mind" was only shown in eleven theaters in a low-key manner, and did not even carry out much publicity, it can be seen from the first batch of 33 film critics that the works that Hugo starred in are still all. An eye-catching object. This is true for the media and so is the audience. Even though the movie is only for screenings, people still burst out with super enthusiasm for this work. One after another, they walked into the cinema on weekends and watched this work. The "Stuart." screened in thousands of nine hundred theaters is not inferior.
This makes everyone naturally look at the box office of the single library. Is it that Hugo is about to break the record again?
Please report us if you find any errors so we can fix it asap!
Among the first comments, the "Hollywood Reporter" focused on Hugo's outstanding performance.
"John Nash is a great challenge for any actor. Just by seeing the life of this character, you can predict that this will be a character who hopes to show his abilities. Genius or lunatic. , This is always the most suitable role for actors, from'Mozart' to'The Silent Lamb', from'The Silent Lamb' to'Taxi Driver', from'Schindler's List' to the'Seven Deadly Sins'...... Among these classic works, we can always see actors in the role of genius or lunatic, showing their acting talents and talents vividly and vividly.
John Nash is both a genius and a lunatic.
So, when this story appeared in sight, everyone knew that it would be a grand acting carnival. However, people have overlooked one thing. When there are too many opportunities to show off, it is easy to lose the rhythm. The performance injects too much energy or the interpretation is too forceful. As a result, the movie becomes a stage play, and the exaggerated effect is disappointing.
For a genius and lunatic, how to accurately grasp the rhythm and proportions is a daunting challenge for any actor. Even Dustin Hoffman in "Rain Man", even Jeffrey Rush in "Shining Style", they can hardly be accurate. But Hugo Lancaster did it.
Hugo rejected every opportunity to overplay the role. He showed strong and precise control. With his extraordinary concentration, he showed us a person who lives almost completely in his inner world. The dramatic display of the character’s psychology is perfectly handled: a vague smile on the lips, the occasional awkward and awkward hand movements, the erratic voice of the speech, the vague tone of southern accent, flickering but bright Concentrated eyes, awkwardly staggering footsteps... With Hugo’s performance, you don’t think this is intentional by the actor, and you don’t feel the power of performance or carving at all. Instead, you think it’s after a deep absorption of the character’s personality. Spread out naturally.
The most memorable scene was that after John Nash learned the truth, he fell into a breakdown in disbelief, and then cut his left hand with his nail to try to find the implanted chip inside, but he failed. When he raised his head, the shock, despair, consternation and collapse in his pupils shocked his soul!
Eyes, facial expressions, gestures, postures, speaking, walking... and even a gesture of bowing one's head can feel the deep shock. Hugo's understanding and interpretation of the character is so perfect that any language of praise loses its color . There is no doubt that Hugo has dedicated the best performance of his career-even after he has dedicated many amazing performances.
Had it not been for Hugo in March this year to just rely on the "Trumen's World" to win his second Oscar, the actor Golden Man, and once again made history, we can almost claim that there will be no battle for the next Oscar for the best actor. suspense. But even so, the performance that can be recorded in the annals of "Beautiful Mind" still gives Hugo the opportunity to continue to make history at the Oscars, which makes Hugo stand in the position of Marlon Brando, Jack Nicholson, Jack Lemmon's height, and half the lead.
Driven by Hugo’s brilliant performances, Charlize Theron has dedicated an award-winning performance for the third consecutive year. Alicia’s temperament ranges from cunning and agile to heavy and difficult to perseverance and maturity. The whole process of transformation was performed delicately and movingly by Charlize, especially the chemical reaction between her and Hugo was carried out throughout, which was called the key to the success of the whole movie.
William Pacher, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, has once again seen the performance spirit of this young actor after a long time. He is calm and domineering, complex and cunning, strong and insidious, and clever tongue. He is free from acting crutches. After that, Leonardo showed the charming charm of the performance, using subtle changes in his eyes to take the role to a whole new level.
There is also Charles played by Heath Ledger, Rosen played by Christopher Plummer, Hansen played by Josh Lucas (.)...Everyone has dedicated a performance that cannot be ignored, making the whole movie change It has to be complete. This is undoubtedly a wonderful work, and the outstanding performance of a group of actors makes the work one of the classics. "
The views of the "Hollywood Reporter" are undoubtedly very novel. They regarded this work as the pinnacle of Hugo. This is really beyond the expectations of many people-everyone knows that Hugo has already been before this. Dedicated many wonderful performances, otherwise he would not exceed Tom Hanks and other two Goldman winners, and Jack Nicholson is ranked as the actor with the most Oscar acting trophies.
As the most authoritative professional magazine on the West Coast, the point of view of the "Hollywood Reporter" is very important. They once again gave a perfect score of 100, which undoubtedly pushed the praise of "Beautiful Mind" to a brand new peak.
In fact, in addition to the "Los Angeles Times," "The New Yorker," and the "Hollywood Reporter," two other media outlets gave a perfect score of 100, namely the Chicago Sun and the Rolling Stones.
Roger Ebert’s "Chicago Sun" not only gave one hundred points, but also gave a recommendation of four stars. To the extreme, he constructed the character’s personality with the behavior details one after another. He awakened the vitality of the character, once again brought breathtaking performances, and made the whole viewing process follow the ups and downs of the character. Sadness and joy overlap."
The full score of "Rolling Stone" was beyond everyone's expectation. This magazine, which has never been too cold with Hugo, did not stingy with his compliments this time. A love story like a fairy tale conveys the courage to go deep into the bones!"
Five full marks undoubtedly make the praise of "Beautiful Mind" reach its peak. What's even more incredible is that several media think this work can be called Hugo's pinnacle work. This is really everyone. Unexpected situation, especially after Hugo just won his second Oscar winner.
Roger Ebert's film reviews can be seen, he gave 100 points to Hugo's performance.
In addition, "USA Today" gave an eighty-eight point, "This is an encouraging film, which perfectly digests a very difficult subject-more than "shiny style" Excellent, this may be the most influential film among all the films that have defeated the spirit demons."
The "Daily News" evaluated 95 points, "Unfortunately, Howard stuck to the rules in the last third of the film, using old-fashioned structures and tear-gas methods to ruin a true and chewy story that is easy to understand. . But before that, you will be intently."
It can be seen that these works that used to be at odds with Hugo have all praised the film one after another, even far exceeding expectations. Only the "New York Post" gave 65 points, "For the film "Beautiful Mind", there will always be more praise and admiration than you might have guessed, but it has not exceeded the belief of its creators. When the film When it does succeed, even though it may not be great on its own, people always do it."
The score given by the "New York Post" was also the lowest score among the first batch of comments. In addition, there was a lot of applause.
"The Wall Street Journal" scored ninety-three points, "Lon Howard and Hugo Lancaster gave the original novel a new life, and added a little Hollywood-style sadness, but there is no doubt that Lancaster's brilliant performance Light up the whole work."
The "Chicago Tribune" once again gave an interesting comment behind the 88-point evaluation, "For someone who has just relied on'Trumen's World' to win an Oscar and is the third gold medalist in five years. For human actors, the'beautiful mind' is undoubtedly the most severe, deepest and most difficult challenge. He does not need to prove his strength, but he needs to prove that he deserves the award. There is no doubt that he did it. When it comes, and far beyond expectations, he can almost say that he has finished this test and delivered the peak performance of his career. It is nothing to say!"
At the end of the comment, the "Chicago Tribune" also teased, "Maybe it is not the pinnacle of work-because we all know that the best work is always the next one."
I have to say that the ridicule of the "Chicago Tribune" is always the best remedy for people after dinner Among the first comments of "Beautiful Mind", 33 media gathered and praised it. The sound occupies an absolute advantage. In the end, the media review reached an excellent 89 points, which far exceeded the reputation of the recent word-of-mouth work "The Sixth Sense of Spirituality", which was born at the end of the year with an absolutely strong posture.
However, even with such excellent results, for Hugo, people have long been used to it-some people even think that this score is lower than expected. Eighty-nine points? Lower than expected? I have to say that now people's ultra-high standards for Hugo have reached a perverted level. But even more frightening is that, even so, Hugo can still surprise people again every time!
Although "Beautiful Mind" was only shown in eleven theaters in a low-key manner, and did not even carry out much publicity, it can be seen from the first batch of 33 film critics that the works that Hugo starred in are still all. An eye-catching object. This is true for the media and so is the audience. Even though the movie is only for screenings, people still burst out with super enthusiasm for this work. One after another, they walked into the cinema on weekends and watched this work. The "Stuart." screened in thousands of nine hundred theaters is not inferior.
This makes everyone naturally look at the box office of the single library. Is it that Hugo is about to break the record again?
Among the first comments, the "Hollywood Reporter" focused on Hugo's outstanding performance."John Nash is a great challenge for any actor. Just by seeing the life of this character, you can predict that this will be a character who hopes to show his abilities. Genius or lunatic. , This is always the most suitable role for actors, from'Mozart' to'The Silent Lamb', from'The Silent Lamb' to'Taxi Driver', from'Schindler's List' to the'Seven Deadly Sins'...... Among these classic works, we can always see actors in the role of genius or lunatic, showing their acting talents and talents vividly and vividly.John Nash is both a genius and a lunatic.So, when this story appeared in sight, everyone knew that it would be a grand acting carnival. However, people have overlooked one thing. When there are too many opportunities to show off, it is easy to lose the rhythm. The performance injects too much energy or the interpretation is too forceful. As a result, the movie becomes a stage play, and the exaggerated effect is disappointing.For a genius and lunatic, how to accurately grasp the rhythm and proportions is a daunting challenge for any actor. Even Dustin Hoffman in "Rain Man", even Jeffrey Rush in "Shining Style", they can hardly be accurate. But Hugo Lancaster did it.Hugo rejected every opportunity to overplay the role. He showed strong and precise control. With his extraordinary concentration, he showed us a person who lives almost completely in his inner world. The dramatic display of the character's psychology is perfectly handled: a vague smile on the lips, the occasional awkward and awkward hand movements, the erratic voice of the speech, the vague tone of southern accent, flickering but bright Concentrated eyes, awkwardly staggering footsteps... With Hugo's performance, you don't think this is intentional by the actor, and you don't feel the power of performance or carving at all. Instead, you think it's after a deep absorption of the character's personality. Spread out naturally.The most memorable scene was that after John Nash learned the truth, he fell into a breakdown in disbelief, and then cut his left hand with his nail to try to find the implanted chip inside, but he failed. When he raised his head, the shock, despair, consternation and collapse in his pupils shocked his soul!Eyes, facial expressions, gestures, postures, speaking, walking... and even a gesture of bowing one's head can feel the deep shock. Hugo's understanding and interpretation of the character is so perfect that any language of praise loses its color . There is no doubt that Hugo has dedicated the best performance of his career-even after he has dedicated many amazing performances.Had it not been for Hugo in March this year to just rely on the "Trumen's World" to win his second Oscar, the actor Golden Man, and once again made history, we can almost claim that there will be no battle for the next Oscar for the best actor. suspense. But even so, the performance that can be recorded in the annals of "Beautiful Mind" still gives Hugo the opportunity to continue to make history at the Oscars, which makes Hugo stand in the position of Marlon Brando, Jack Nicholson, Jack Lemmon's height, and half the lead.Driven by Hugo's brilliant performances, Charlize Theron has dedicated an award-winning performance for the third consecutive year. Alicia's temperament ranges from cunning and agile to heavy and difficult to perseverance and maturity. The whole process of transformation was performed delicately and movingly by Charlize, especially the chemical reaction between her and Hugo was carried out throughout, which was called the key to the success of the whole movie.William Pacher, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, has once again seen the performance spirit of this young actor after a long time. He is calm and domineering, complex and cunning, strong and insidious, and clever tongue. He is free from acting crutches. After that, Leonardo showed the charming charm of the performance, using subtle changes in his eyes to take the role to a whole new level.There is also Charles played by Heath Ledger, Rosen played by Christopher Plummer, Hansen played by Josh Lucas ....Everyone has dedicated a performance that cannot be ignored, making the whole movie change It has to be complete. This is undoubtedly a wonderful work, and the outstanding performance of a group of actors makes the work one of the classics. "The views of the "Hollywood Reporter" are undoubtedly very novel. They regarded this work as the pinnacle of Hugo. This is really beyond the expectations of many people-everyone knows that Hugo has already been before this. Dedicated many wonderful performances, otherwise he would not exceed Tom Hanks and other two Goldman winners, and Jack Nicholson is ranked as the actor with the most Oscar acting trophies.As the most authoritative professional magazine on the West Coast, the point of view of the "Hollywood Reporter" is very important. They once again gave a perfect score of 100, which undoubtedly pushed the praise of "Beautiful Mind" to a brand new peak.In fact, in addition to the "Los Angeles Times," "The New Yorker," and the "Hollywood Reporter," two other media outlets gave a perfect score of 100, namely the Chicago Sun and the Rolling Stones.Roger Ebert's "Chicago Sun" not only gave one hundred points, but also gave a recommendation of four stars. To the extreme, he constructed the character's personality with the behavior details one after another. He awakened the vitality of the character, once again brought breathtaking performances, and made the whole viewing process follow the ups and downs of the character. Sadness and joy overlap."The full score of "Rolling Stone" was beyond everyone's expectation. This magazine, which has never been too cold with Hugo, did not stingy with his compliments this time. A love story like a fairy tale conveys the courage to go deep into the bones!"Five full marks undoubtedly make the praise of "Beautiful Mind" reach its peak. What's even more incredible is that several media think this work can be called Hugo's pinnacle work. This is really everyone. Unexpected situation, especially after Hugo just won his second Oscar winner.Roger Ebert's film reviews can be seen, he gave 100 points to Hugo's performance.In addition, "USA Today" gave an eighty-eight point, "This is an encouraging film, which perfectly digests a very difficult subject-more than "shiny style" Excellent, this may be the most influential film among all the films that have defeated the spirit demons."The "Daily News" evaluated 95 points, "Unfortunately, Howard stuck to the rules in the last third of the film, using old-fashioned structures and tear-gas methods to ruin a true and chewy story that is easy to understand. . But before that, you will be intently."It can be seen that these works that used to be at odds with Hugo have all praised the film one after another, even far exceeding expectations. Only the "New York Post" gave 65 points, "For the film "Beautiful Mind", there will always be more praise and admiration than you might have guessed, but it has not exceeded the belief of its creators. When the film When it does succeed, even though it may not be great on its own, people always do it."The score given by the "New York Post" was also the lowest score among the first batch of comments. In addition, there was a lot of applause."The Wall Street Journal" scored ninety-three points, "Lon Howard and Hugo Lancaster gave the original novel a new life, and added a little Hollywood-style sadness, but there is no doubt that Lancaster's brilliant performance Light up the whole work."The "Chicago Tribune" once again gave an interesting comment behind the 88-point evaluation, "For someone who has just relied on'Trumen's World' to win an Oscar and is the third gold medalist in five years. For human actors, the'beautiful mind' is undoubtedly the most severe, deepest and most difficult challenge. He does not need to prove his strength, but he needs to prove that he deserves the award. There is no doubt that he did it. When it comes, and far beyond expectations, he can almost say that he has finished this test and delivered the peak performance of his career. It is nothing to say!"At the end of the comment, the "Chicago Tribune" also teased, "Maybe it is not the pinnacle of work-because we all know that the best work is always the next one."I have to say that the ridicule of the "Chicago Tribune" is always the best remedy for people after dinner Among the first comments of "Beautiful Mind", 33 media gathered and praised it. The sound occupies an absolute advantage. In the end, the media review reached an excellent 89 points, which far exceeded the reputation of the recent word-of-mouth work "The Sixth Sense of Spirituality", which was born at the end of the year with an absolutely strong posture.However, even with such excellent results, for Hugo, people have long been used to it-some people even think that this score is lower than expected. Eighty-nine points? Lower than expected? I have to say that now people's ultra-high standards for Hugo have reached a perverted level. But even more frightening is that, even so, Hugo can still surprise people again every time!Although "Beautiful Mind" was only shown in eleven theaters in a low-key manner, and did not even carry out much publicity, it can be seen from the first batch of 33 film critics that the works that Hugo starred in are still all. An eye-catching object. This is true for the media and so is the audience. Even though the movie is only for screenings, people still burst out with super enthusiasm for this work. One after another, they walked into the cinema on weekends and watched this work. The "Stuart." screened in thousands of nine hundred theaters is not inferior.This makes everyone naturally look at the box office of the single library. Is it that Hugo is about to break the record again?
